Rodriguez v. Artuz, 98-2252
Citation | 161 F.3d 763 |
Decision Date | 21 December 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 98-2252,98-2252 |
Parties | Alfredo RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Christopher ARTUZ, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
Marsha R. Taubenhaus, New York City, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Assistant District Attorney, Bronx County (Nancy D. Killian, Assistant District Attorney, of counsel), Bronx, New York, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.
Alfredo Rodriguez appeals from Judge Sotomayor's order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Rodriguez contends that application of the one-year statute of limitations in Section 2244 effects an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. See U.S. Const., Art. I, § 9, cl. 2. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodriguez v. Artuz, 990 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y.1998).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rhodes v. Senkowski
...effective date of the AEDPA did not violate the Suspension Clause. Rodriguez v. Artuz, 990 F.Supp. 275, 277-84 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 161 F.3d 763 (2d Cir.1998); accord, Alexander v. Keane, 991 F.Supp. 329, 334-40 (S.D.N.Y.1998); Albert v. Strack, 97 Civ. 2978, 1998 WL 9382 at *4 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.......
-
Lisker v. Knowles
...of actual or legal innocence has been raised ... the [AEPA's time] limits do not render habeas inadequate or ineffective"), aff'd 161 F.3d 763 (2d Cir.1998). The Supreme Court has assumed, without deciding, that there is a constitutional right to federal habeas review of state court judgmen......
-
Wyche v. U.S.
...2001) (citations omitted); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 113 (2d Cir.2000) (citing Rodriguez v. Artuz, 161 F.3d 763, 764 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam)); Molo v. Johnson, 207 F.3d 773, 775 (5th Cir.2000) (per curiam). The Supreme Court has similarly upheld the AEDPA's......
-
Ruiz-Martinez v. Mukasey
...not render the habeas remedy `inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of detention.'" 209 F.3d at 113; see also Rodriguez v. Artuz, 161 F.3d 763, 764 (2d Cir.1998) (affirming the dismissal of an untimely petition for a writ of habeas corpus as the one-year statute of limitations peri......