Rodriguez v. Artuz, 98-2252

Citation161 F.3d 763
Decision Date21 December 1998
Docket NumberNo. 98-2252,98-2252
PartiesAlfredo RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Christopher ARTUZ, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

Marsha R. Taubenhaus, New York City, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Assistant District Attorney, Bronx County (Nancy D. Killian, Assistant District Attorney, of counsel), Bronx, New York, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alfredo Rodriguez appeals from Judge Sotomayor's order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Rodriguez contends that application of the one-year statute of limitations in Section 2244 effects an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. See U.S. Const., Art. I, § 9, cl. 2. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodriguez v. Artuz, 990 F.Supp. 275 (S.D.N.Y.1998).

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Rhodes v. Senkowski
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 21, 2000
    ...effective date of the AEDPA did not violate the Suspension Clause. Rodriguez v. Artuz, 990 F.Supp. 275, 277-84 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 161 F.3d 763 (2d Cir.1998); accord, Alexander v. Keane, 991 F.Supp. 329, 334-40 (S.D.N.Y.1998); Albert v. Strack, 97 Civ. 2978, 1998 WL 9382 at *4 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.......
  • Lisker v. Knowles
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • October 10, 2006
    ...of actual or legal innocence has been raised ... the [AEPA's time] limits do not render habeas inadequate or ineffective"), aff'd 161 F.3d 763 (2d Cir.1998). The Supreme Court has assumed, without deciding, that there is a constitutional right to federal habeas review of state court judgmen......
  • Wyche v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • April 23, 2004
    ...2001) (citations omitted); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 113 (2d Cir.2000) (citing Rodriguez v. Artuz, 161 F.3d 763, 764 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam)); Molo v. Johnson, 207 F.3d 773, 775 (5th Cir.2000) (per curiam). The Supreme Court has similarly upheld the AEDPA's......
  • Ruiz-Martinez v. Mukasey
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • February 14, 2008
    ...not render the habeas remedy `inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of detention.'" 209 F.3d at 113; see also Rodriguez v. Artuz, 161 F.3d 763, 764 (2d Cir.1998) (affirming the dismissal of an untimely petition for a writ of habeas corpus as the one-year statute of limitations peri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT