Rodriguez v. Schweiker
Decision Date | 25 March 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 80-1519,80-1519 |
Citation | 640 F.2d 682 |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Parties | Justo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. Summary Calendar. . Unit A |
Malcolm McGregor, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Rebecca D. Westfall, Asst. U. S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Before AINSWORTH, GARZA and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.
The appellant Justo Rodriguez brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (now the Department of Health and Human Services) denying his claim for disability insurance benefits. The administrative decision was subsequently affirmed by the district court. Rodriguez is a sixty year old man with an eighth grade education. He was born in Puerto Rico and speaks and reads both English and Spanish, although he is more fluent in the latter. He is married and has three children. Rodriguez served in the United States Army from 1949 until 1973. In the army, he was trained as a mechanic and performed in that function throughout his period of enlistment. While serving in Vietnam, he received an injury to his right hand due to rocket fragments. Rodriguez was hospitalized for a short time in 1968. In 1971, an operation was performed on his right hand. Because of his physical condition, Rodriguez was discharged from the army in 1973. After his discharge from the service, he underwent another operation on his hand. None of the surgery performed on his right hand was successful. Due to the injury, Rodriguez is unable to grip anything with his right hand. In 1974, the Veterans Administration rated his disability at 70% due to heart disease and his injury. This was later increased in 1976 to complete disability.
After his separation from the service and his operations, he attempted to obtain employment as a mechanic but was unable to retain any such jobs because of his inability to use his right hand. He then obtained employment as a security guard, but Rodriguez testified that he resigned on the basis of doctor's recommendation to do so. Rodriguez also complained of shortness of breath and pain in his chest, shoulder, hips and knees. Rodriguez testified at his administrative hearing that he cannot bend, he is unable to walk more than half a block at a time, he can stand for only fifteen or twenty minutes and can remain sitting for only a half hour to an hour. Rodriguez claims that he is unable to perform security guard work because of his shortness of breath and his great difficulty in walking.
In February of 1977, Rodriguez began attending a watch repair school. He stated at the hearing that he would be capable of pursuing such a livelihood because he is able to work at his own pace, and he can do all the work with his left hand.
Rodriguez sought disability insurance benefits from HEW which were denied in March of 1977. He requested reconsideration and was granted an administrative hearing. The hearing was held on December 1, 1977, at which time he was represented by counsel. The only oral evidence presented was that of Rodriguez. During the hearing, Rodriguez was asked by the administrative law judge (ALJ) if he could work as a self-service gas station attendant. Rodriguez replied in the negative. At the conclusion of the hearing, the ALJ stated that he believed Rodriguez to have been a credible witness. Included in the record are the medical reports and clinical diagnoses of Rodriguez. One of these documents is the diagnosis of Dr. Donald A. Malooly, who stated in 1977 that Rodriguez had a chronic obstructive lung disease which was not substantially relieved by medication. He also concluded that Rodriguez could not use his hand in a job requiring repeated lifting and handling of items. Dr. Malooly also believed that bending and stooping were slightly limited and that walking could be accomplished within the limits of his pulmonary ability. Regarding his pulmonary abilities, Dr. Malooly stated that Rodriguez has a hypertensive disease and that his heart size is borderline.
The ALJ held that Rodriguez was not disabled and denied benefits. The ALJ held that Rodriguez could perform work as a cashier in a self-service gas station or as a gateman. The Appeals Council affirmed the ALJ's decision, thereby making it the final judgment of the Secretary. Rodriguez appealed to the district court, which found there was substantial evidence supporting the ALJ's decision and affirmed the ruling of the Secretary.
Rodriguez contends on appeal that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary's findings. Rodriguez further contends that he satisfied his burden of showing a prima facie case of disability and that the burden should have shifted to the Secretary.
An individual who is claiming disability insurance benefits must show that he is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last at least twelve months. 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(1)(A). The burden of proving this rests clearly upon the claimant. Flowers v. Harris, 616 F.2d 776, 778 (5th Cir. 1980). If the claimant is able to meet this burden, however, it shifts to the Secretary who must show that the claimant is capable of engaging in some substantial gainful activity available in the national economy. Western v. Harris, 633 F.2d 1204, 1206 (5th Cir. 1981). In reviewing a decision of the Secretary, an appellate court may not reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the Secretary's. Warncke v. Harris, 619 F.2d 412, 416 (5th Cir. 1980). Rather, our sole scope...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Loza v. Apfel, 98-50892
...weight and should not have been disregarded by the ALJ. See Latham v. Shalala, 36 F.3d 482, 483 (5th Cir. 1994); Rodriguez v. Schweiker, 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. 1981); Epps v. Harris, 624 F.2d 1267, 1274 (5th Cir. 1980); DePaepe v. Richardson, 464 F.2d 92, 101 (5th Cir. 1972). The recor......
-
Kieser v. Barnhart
...it is evidence that should be given great weight. Olson v. Schweiker, 663 F.2d 593, 597, n. 4 (5th Cir. 1981); Rodriguez v. Schweiker, 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir.1981); Hogard v. Sullivan, 733 F.Supp. 1465, 1470 1. The time for filing an application for attorneys fees under the Equal Access......
-
Sam v. Berryhill, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-00422-N
...specific reasons if the ALJ discounts that determination." Brown-Gaudet-Evans, 673 F. App'x at 904 (citing Rodriguez v. Schweiker, 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. Unit A Mar. 25, 1981)).V. Conclusion In accordance with the foregoing analysis, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision denyi......
-
Perez v. Colvin
...Secretary [now Commissioner], are entitled to great weight. " 703 F.2d 1233, 1241 (11th Cir. 1983) (emphasis added); citing Rodriguez v. Schweiker , 640 F.2d 682, 686 ; Epps v. Harris , 624 F.2d 1267, 1274 (5th Cir. 1980) ; DePaepe v. Richardson , 464 F.2d 92, 101 (5th Cir. 1972).The Eleven......
-
Issue Topics
...is evidence that should be given great weight. Olson v. Schweiker , 663 F.2d 593, 597 n.4 (5th Cir. 1981); Rodriguez v. Schweiker , 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). The Fifth Circuit reiterated in 2000 that a “VA rating of 100 percent service connected disability is not legally bin......
-
Issue topics
...is evidence that should be given great weight. Olson v. Schweiker , 663 F.2d 593, 597 n.4 (5th Cir. 1981); Rodriguez v. Schweiker , 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). The Fifth Circuit reiterated in 2000 that a “VA rating of 100 percent service connected disability is not legally bin......
-
Table of Cases
...198 (S.D.N.Y. 1985), § 1107.7 Rodriguez v. Massanari , 2001 WL 406226 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2001), §§ 317.2, 1317.1 Rodriguez v. Schweiker , 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. 1981), § 1207.1 Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs. , 46 F.3d 1114 (Table), No. 94-1868 (1st Cir. 1995),§§ 110......
-
Issue topics
...is evidence that should be given great weight. Olson v. Schweiker , 663 F.2d 593, 597 n.4 (5th Cir. 1981); Rodriguez v. Schweiker , 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). The Fifth Circuit reiterated in 2000 that a “VA rating of 100 percent service connected disability is not legally bin......