Roga v. Westin

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore BRACKEN
CitationRoga v. Westin, 622 N.Y.S.2d 777, 212 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Decision Date21 February 1995
PartiesAriel ROGA, Appellant, v. Monica WESTIN, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Neil A. Miller, Mineola, for appellant.

Fletcher, Sibell, Migatz & Burns, P.C., Manhasset (Bruce W. Migatz, of counsel), for respondent.

Before BRACKEN, J.P., and BALLETTA, COPERTINO and HART, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, to recover a down payment on a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated October 6, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant Monica Westin for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that none of the grounds presented by the plaintiff excused him from performance under the contract. The plaintiff failed to present evidence to support a finding that a valid and subsisting certificate of occupancy was not in effect for the premises. The plaintiff's own actions in seeking to have the certificate revoked support this conclusion.

Pursuant to paragraph 10(a) of the contract, the defendant was obligated to "comply with all notes or notices of violations of law or municipal ordinances, orders or requirements noted or issued as of the date hereof", and convey the premises "free of them at Closing". By its plain language, this provision clearly refers only to "notes or notices of violations" issued as of the date of the contract (see, Hattman v. 212-214 South Ninth Street Corp., 147 N.Y.S.2d 552; Kaloumenos v. Bottaccio, 67 N.Y.S.2d 527, aff'd 273 App.Div. 907, 77 N.Y.S.2d 286; see also, Friedman Contracts and Conveyances of Real Property, § 3.6 [5th ed].

The contract provision requiring the premises to be...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Kollatz v. Kos Bldg. Grp., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 25, 2020
    ...of the subject provision applies only to notes or notices of violations issued as of the date of closing (see Roga v. Westin, 212 A.D.2d 685, 685–686, 622 N.Y.S.2d 777 ). Accordingly, the Contract of Sale, submitted by the defendants, utterly refuted the plaintiff's factual allegations conc......
  • Mendez v. Abel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 2, 2012
    ...mortgage commitment had been revoked, plaintiff could not cancel the contract of sale based on that revocation ( see Roga v. Westin, 212 A.D.2d 685, 622 N.Y.S.2d 777 [1995];Arnold v. Birnbaum, 193 A.D.2d 710, 598 N.Y.S.2d 68 [1993] ). The contract of sale thus remained in force. Since a cer......
  • Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 21, 1995