Rogers v. State

Docket NumberCR-17-916
Decision Date25 October 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Collins v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 18, 2019
    ...the majority in the case before us is precisely the type of harmless-error analysis that this court rejected in Rogers v. State , 2018 Ark. 309, 558 S.W.3d 833 ( Rogers II ). In Rogers II , we granted rehearing and reversed Rogers v. State , 2018 Ark. 242, 550 S.W.3d 387 ( Rogers I ). As in......
  • Stanton v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 17, 2020
    ...concerning the large knife in the backpack.Stanton has a constitutional right to impeach a witness on cross-examination. Rogers v. State , 2018 Ark. 309, 558 S.W.3d 833. A prior inconsistent statement is a prime means of impeaching a witness's credibility. Ark. R. Evid. 613. In his previous......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 1, 2020
    ...victim alone can sustain a conviction for rape and that credibility issues are left for the jury to resolve.); see also Rogers v. State, 2018 Ark. 309, 558 S.W.3d 833. ...
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • March 6, 2019
    ...credibility was critical to the jury's resolution of the conflicting stories, we reverse and remand for a new trial. See Rogers v. State , 2018 Ark. 309, 558 S.W.3d 833.Reversed and remanded. Gladwin, Glover, and Vaught, JJ., agree. Gruber, C.J., and Brown, J., dissent. Waymond M. Brown, Ju......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PAST-ACTS EVIDENCE IN EXCESSIVE FORCE LITIGATION.
    • United States
    • Washington University Law Review Vol. 100 No. 2, October 2022
    • October 1, 2022
    ...crimen falsi. See, e.g., Williams v. United States, 337 A.2d 772 (D.C. 1975) (possessing firearm without a license); Rogers v. State, 558 S.W.3d 833, 841 (Ark. 2018) (all theft); Zukowski v. Dunton, 650 F.2d 30, 34 (4th Cir. 1981) (willful failure to provide information for income tax (215.......