Rogoff v. Rockview Dairies, Inc., 111519 NVSC, 79786

Docket Nº:79786
Party Name:MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, v. ROCKVIEW DAIRIES, INC., Respondent.
Judge Panel:Pickering, J., Parraguirre, J., Cadish, J. Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
Case Date:November 15, 2019
Court:Supreme Court of Nevada
 
FREE EXCERPT

MARLENE ROGOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellant,

v.

ROCKVIEW DAIRIES, INC., Respondent.

No. 79786

Supreme Court of Nevada

November 15, 2019

UNPUBLISHED OPNION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment and dismissing a complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

The challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because respondent's counterclaim remains pending in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) ("[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs."). Although an arbitration award finding in favor of respondent on the counterclaim was entered on October 7, 2019, to date, it does not appear that any written, file-stamped district court order formally resolves the counterclaim. And no other statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal and orders this appeal dismissed...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP