Roller v. State
| Decision Date | 27 February 1995 |
| Docket Number | S94A1586,Nos. S94A1584,s. S94A1584 |
| Citation | Roller v. State, 453 S.E.2d 740, 265 Ga. 213 (Ga. 1995) |
| Parties | ROLLER v. The STATE (Two Cases). |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Jackie R. Roller, pro se.
Robert E. Keller, Dist. Atty., Todd E. Naugle, Asst. Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Peggy R. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law, Atlanta, for State.
Jackie Ray Roller was indicted for murder, felony murder, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, all in connection with the shooting death of his former spouse. A jury convicted Roller of felony murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, and the trial court sentenced Roller to life imprisonment and a consecutive five years, respectively. 1
1. The victim died after being shot in the back in a supermarket parking lot. At trial, the State presented evidence showing that from the time they separated until the time the victim died Roller had harassed the victim and threatened to kill her if she did not return to him. On the morning of the victim's death, Roller stopped the victim in the parking lot, which she customarily used as a shortcut when driving to her office. According to witnesses present in the parking lot, Roller's truck was parked next to the victim's car, Roller and the victim were standing outside of the vehicles arguing in loud voices, Roller chased the victim, and she yelled "Oh, no, please don't." Witnesses then heard gunshots, and saw Roller throw what looked like a gun in his truck and drive off. The victim was found lying dead in a pool of blood beside her car. There was a tire track through the pool of blood which matched the tires on Roller's truck, and his truck tires and truck body had blood on them which matched the victim's uncommon blood type. We find the evidence sufficient to allow a rational trier of fact to find Roller guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. The indictment named possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as the offense underlying the felony murder charge. Relying on Ford v. State, 262 Ga. 602, 423 S.E.2d 255 (1992), Roller argues that the trial court erred in allowing that offense to underlie the felony murder conviction. However, unlike the offense in Ford, 2 under the circumstances of this case the status offense has an undeniable connection to the homicide, see Hall v. State, 259 Ga. 243, 244, 378 S.E.2d 860 (1989), and was dangerous and life threatening, see Ford v. State, 262 Ga. at 603, 423 S.E.2d 255. There is no merit to this argument.
3. We have considered the appellant's remaining enumerations and we find no error requiring reversal. 3
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
1 The crimes were committed on April 25, 1990, and Roller was indicted during the November 1990 term of the Clayton County...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Shivers v. State
...v. State, 276 Ga. 491, 493, 578 S.E.2d 868 (2003); Metts v. State, 270 Ga. 481, 482-483, 511 S.E.2d 508 (1999); Roller v. State, 265 Ga. 213, 214, 453 S.E.2d 740 (1995); Sims v. State, 265 Ga. 35, 35 n. 2, 453 S.E.2d 33 3. If we are to treat Ford as good law, however, we should not corrupt ......
-
Waldrip v. State
...charge was material to the victim's murder. Chapman v. State, 266 Ga. 356, 357-358(2), 467 S.E.2d 497 (1996); Roller v. State, 265 Ga. 213, 214(2), 453 S.E.2d 740 (1995); compare Ford v. State, 262 Ga. 602, 603-604, 423 S.E.2d 255 17. The State did not violate Brady v. Maryland 11 by failin......
-
Martin v. State
...underlying felony for the felony murder conviction. Weems v. State, 267 Ga. 182, 183(2), 476 S.E.2d 585 (1996); Roller v. State, 265 Ga. 213, 214(2), 453 S.E.2d 740 (1995). Compare Ford v. State, 262 Ga. 602, 423 S.E.2d 255 (1992). Accordingly, the possession charge was material to the felo......
-
Metts v. State
...possession of the firearm was dangerous and life-threatening, and had "an undeniable connection to the homicide...." Roller v. State, 265 Ga. 213(2), 453 S.E.2d 740 (1995). See also Chapman v. State, 266 Ga. 356(2), 467 S.E.2d 497 (1996). In light of the circumstances, the status felony was......