Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc.

Decision Date03 February 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-485,82-485
Citation427 So.2d 911
PartiesJennifer S. RONSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEGNAUD MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Charles Brandt, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Pugh & Boudreaux, Donlon Pugh, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before STOKER, YELVERTON and KNOLL, JJ.

STOKER, Judge.

Is an automobile repairman who performs faulty work responsible to a driver criminally attacked when the vehicle breaks down on the open road?

The plaintiff sues defendant, Begnaud Motors, Inc., for damages she received in the course of a rape, beating, and robbery which occurred while plaintiff was stranded in her employer's automobile. Plaintiff had just previously picked up the vehicle from the defendant, which had done repair work on the vehicle.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's ruling sustaining defendant's peremptory exception of no cause of action. We affirm.

The plaintiff contends on appeal that her petition states causes of action based on two theories of recovery, tort and breach of contract. With reference to the breach of contract theory, we find that plaintiff has not alleged damages arising out of failure to perform the contract. With reference to the tort theory, the risk to which the plaintiff was exposed did not fall within the scope of the duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

FACTS

Inasmuch as we must accept the allegations contained in plaintiff's petition as true for the purposes of reviewing the validity of the exception, we quote from the petition as follows:

(2)

"On or about April 14, 1981, petitioner Jennifer S. Ronstadt, was employed by Sullair Gulf States, Inc., a subsidiary of Sullair Corporation. She had been provided with a company vehicle, particularly a 1981 Oldsmobile, Model 88, which she brought to Begnaud Motors, Inc., to have certain repair work done, particularly to replace an air conditioner belt because the air conditioner was not working. (3)

"While the vehicle was in the shop being repaired, a plug which fit into the alternator of the subject vehicle was disconnected, apparently in order to effect repairs.

(4)

"The employee or employees who repaired the vehicle in question failed to replace this plug.

(5)

"Petitioner received her vehicle from Begnaud Motors and was advised that it had been repaired satisfactorily.

(6)

"At approximately 5:00 P.M. on April 14, 1981, after taking delivery of the subject vehicle from Begnaud Motors, Inc., petitioner began a trip to New Orleans, Louisiana. When petitioner reached the Gramercy exit she turned her lights on and her car slowed down as if it were going to stop and her lights went out. She turned off on the Gramercy exit in an effort to get to a mechanic to have the problem resolved.

(7)

"After traveling a number of miles in a vain search for help, she made a U-turn and started back towards the interstate. The car stopped running and completely died several miles from the interstate.

(8)

"Petitioner pulled the vehicle onto the shoulder of the road and stopped. A few moments later a man in a pickup truck approached her under the pretense of rendering aid. At the time her vehicle had stopped she had her windows approximately one half rolled down and the individual who had stopped, purportedly to render aid, asked her to pull the latch on her hood so that he could examine her engine compartment. When she did so, he reached inside the door and pulled open the lock, and opened the door.

(9)

"Producing a pistol, he shoved it in her face and threatened to kill her if she did not cooperate. He shoved her violently around in the interior of the vehicle onto the passenger floor side. He stole petitioner's valuables, and after twisting petitioner's neck back and forth by jerking her by the hair, this unknown male subject raped petitioner.

(10)

"This unknown male subject then made good his getaway.

(11)

"Soon thereafter three men came to her rescue, and, examining her vehicle, found that the plug connecting to the alternator had not been replaced at the repair shop by the employees of Begnaud Motors.

(12)

"Replacing the plug, these men gave her a jump start and escorted her back to the interstate where she was able to flag down an officer of the law.

(13)

"The above described injury to petitioner resulted solely from the negligence of the defendant in the following particulars:

A) In failing to properly repair petitioner's vehicle;

B) In failing to discover that the alternator plug was disconnected;

C) In failing to reattach the alternator plug to the alternator;

D) In disconnecting the plug to the alternator;

E) In failing to do what they could have done to prevent petitioner's car from breaking down;

F) In causing petitioner's car to malfunction.

(14)

"Defendant is also liable to petitioner for breach of contract under Article 1930 of the Louisiana Civil code for all damages which petitioner has sustained by the default of defendant.

(15)

"As a result in the above described negligence petitioner suffered severe and painful personal injuries, including, but without limitation, acute traumatic cervical strain, acute traumatic upper thoracic sprain, acute traumatic cervical brechial syndrome, cervical and upper thoracic myofacitis, myalgia, a reoccurance of a dormant condition known as diffuse gastritis and irritable bowel disorder with mixed emotional features including anxiety, depression, with some psyiophysicologic muskuloskeletal components.

(16)

"Although petitioner had attempted to work, she has been diagnosed as completely disabled at this time.

(17)

"Petitioner has been hospitalized and treated by numerous physicians in connection with the injuries suffered.

(18)

"At the time of her injury, petitioner was engaged in the business of oilfield sales and was, in addition to her salary of $1,600 per month, paid a commission on all sales together with being provided with a company car, medical insurance, and an expense account which petitioner alleges is the equivalent of a ----

(19)

"Petitioner has suffered severe pain and endured keen mental anguish as a result of the negligence of defendant.

(20)

"Petitioner avers that she is entitled to the following amounts from the defendant as a result of the accident and negligence set forth herein above.

                  1)  Hospital expenses, past
                      and future ...................... $20,000.00
                  2)  Surgeons services, past
                      and future ....................... 20,000.00
                  3)  Physical pain and suffering ..... 500,000.00
                  4)  Loss of wages to date of
                      filing suit ...................... 24,000.00
                  5)  Permanent disability and
                      loss of the enjoyment of
                      life ............................ 500,000.00
                  6)  Loss of future wages .......... 1,440,000.00
                  7)  Mental anguish and pain ......... 500,000.00
                  8)  Loss of personal items
                      stolen ............................ 7,245.00
                                                     -------------
                      TOTAL                          $3,011,000.00
                

"WHEREFOR, petitioner prays that after due proceedings, there be judgment herein favor of petitioner, JENNIFER S. RONSTADT, and against the defendant, BEGNAUD MOTORS, INC., in the sum of $3,011,000.00 together with legal interest from date of judicial demand and for all costs of these proceedings."

BREACH OF CONTRACT THEORY

We conclude that plaintiff's petition does not state a cause of action for breach of contract. To properly state such a cause of action a plaintiff must allege a violation of the contract and that damages were sustained as a result. LSA-C.C. art. 1930. Damages recoverable...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Crochet v. Hospital Service Dist. No. 1 of Terrebonne Parish
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 8 Octubre 1985
    ...v. McDonald's Corp., 439 So.2d 561 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983), writ not considered, 442 So.2d 462 (La.1983); Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc., 427 So.2d 911 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983), writ denied 430 So.2d 82 (La.1983). This duty to protect business patrons does not extend to the unforeseeable or ......
  • Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 12 Enero 1984
    ...by the court on a case-by-case basis, with each court weighing the policy factors it considers important. Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc., 427 So.2d 911 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983). Plaintiffs argue that Officer Walker was negligent during two periods in time and that these periods of negligence......
  • Jarvis v. J.I. Case Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 11 Octubre 1989
    ...of a parking lot lighting system (Crochet v. Hospital Dist. No. 1, supra ) and an automobile repairman (Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc., 427 So.2d 911 (La.App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, 430 So.2d 82 (La.1983)) were not liable to victims for the criminal acts of third persons, because the mann......
  • Winters v. PROTECTIVE CAS. INS. CO., Civ. A. No. 86-540-A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • 3 Febrero 1988
    ...duty owed must be determined on a case by case basis with each court weighing the important policy factors. Ronstadt v. Begnaud Motors, Inc., 427 So.2d 911 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983). It is undisputed that the accident occurred in the parking lot of University Shopping Center, located near the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT