Roosevelt, In re
| Decision Date | 23 October 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-55160,95-55160 |
| Citation | 98 F.3d 1169 |
| Parties | 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,875 In re Theodore Steven ROOSEVELT, Debtor. FINALCO, INC., Appellant, v. Theodore Steven ROOSEVELT, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
The opinion filed on June 10, 1996, appearing at 87 F.3d 311 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:
Page 313, column one, penultimate line: delete "all of"; last line: delete "community" column two, paragraph 1, line 2: change "be" to "become", delete "transmuted into" line 3: delete "Bankruptcy Appellate Panel" and insert "trial court" line 6: add a new sentence reading "Steven has not appealed that finding."
Page 314, column one, footnote 3, lines 3 & 4: delete "community property" and insert "separate property of one spouse"; change "either" to "the other"; line 5: change "(a)" to "(c)" column two, line 16: change "community" to "separate" line 33: insert a period between "property" and the closing quotation mark; delete "or 'community property.' "
Page 315, column two, line 1: change "denied" to "granted"
Page 318, column two, first paragraph, line 6: after "discharged." insert Then begin a new paragraph with "Stephen also points out...."
At the end of the new second paragraph, insert a new sentence: "We do not find this argument terribly persuasive."
Page 318, column two, paragraph 2 (new paragraph 3) line 1: delete "While we are not terribly moved by Steven's second argument" and insert "Nonetheless, as argued above"
Page 319, column one, paragraph 3, line 16: change "community" to "his separate"
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Beverly
...791-92 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc), overruling, e.g., Finalco, Inc. v. Roosevelt (In re Roosevelt), 87 F.3d 311, 314, as amended, 98 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir.1996) (§ 727 reviewed for abuse of discretion), and Friedkin v. Sternberg (In re Sternberg), 85 F.3d 1400, 1404-05 (9th Cir. 1996) (same); Fi......
-
In re Smith
...of fact for clear error and reviewing conclusions of law de novo. In re Roosevelt, 87 F.3d 311, 314 n. 2 (9th Cir.1996), amended, 98 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1209, 117 S.Ct. 1691, 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997). "Whether there was reasonable reliance, and whether there was i......
-
Latman v. Burdette
...debtor's wrongdoing in or in connection with the bankruptcy case"); see also In re Roosevelt, 87 F.3d 311, 317 & n. 12, amended by 98 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir.1996) (stating the primary purpose of § 727(a) is punishment of a debtor who has committed wrongdoing in a bankruptcy case), overruled on ......
-
In re Bledsoe
...endorsed his view in Roosevelt v. Ray (In re Roosevelt), 176 B.R. 200 (9th Cir. BAP 1994), aff'd 87 F.3d 311, opinion amended 98 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir.1996), cert. den'd sub nom Finalco, Inc. v. Roosevelt, 520 U.S. 1209, 117 S.Ct. 1691, 137 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997). That case involved transfers made......
-
Chapter 17 Discharge and Dischargeability
...2007 WL 7238117, at *7 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Sept. 18, 2007); In re Roosevelt, 87 F.3d 311 (9th Cir. 1996) opinion amended on denial of reh'g, 98 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 1996) overruled on other grounds by In re Bammer, 131 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 1997).[12] See In re Connelly, 59 B.R. 421, 430 (Bankr. N......