Rosado v. State
Decision Date | 21 January 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 4D07-4889.,4D07-4889. |
Parties | Elias ROSADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Elias Rosado, Madison, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sue-Ellen Kenny, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Appellant, Elias Rosado, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. In the petition, he requested the trial court order his appointed trial counsel to submit to him copies of documentation from his previous litigation for the purpose of preparing a petition for post-conviction relief. The petition was denied by the trial court. Rosado claims the trial court abused its discretion. We agree, as Rosado's court-appointed counsel was obligated to submit to him, free of charge, documentation from his case file prepared at the public's expense.
An appellate court reviews a trial court's decision on a petition for writ of mandamus under the abuse of discretion standard of review. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla.2004) ().1 Although "[f]iles prepared and maintained by an attorney for the purpose of representing a client are the attorney's personal property .... transcripts [or record documents] that were prepared at public expense on behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to the defendant without charge for copying." Potts v. State, 869 So.2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citation omitted).
Accordingly, we Id. The trial court, however, "shall deny the petition to the extent that it requests free copies of other documents contained in" the court-appointed attorney's file not obtained via the public's expense. Id.
Reversed and Remanded.
1. Because mandamus relief is "`used to compel an official to perform lawful duties,'" it is the appropriate means to seek copies of legal documentation from court-appointed counsel, as a "`court-appointed lawyer is an "official"'" for purposes of mandamus relief. Potts v. State, 869 So.2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (quoting Pearce v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Villa Bellini Ristorante & Lounge, Inc. v. Mancini
...review the ruling for an abuse of discretion. See Brown v. Jones, 229 So. 3d 397, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (citing Rosado v. State, 1 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ); Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs Broward Cty. Fla. v. Parrish, 154 So. 3d 412, 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We afford that deferential......
-
James v. Crews, 1D13–2785.
...a dismissal of the complaint, orders granting or denying the writ are subject to review only for abuse of discretion. Rosado v. State, 1 So.3d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). ...
-
Hollis v. Massa
... ... A trial court's ruling on a petition for writ of mandamus is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Rosado v. State , 1 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). However, "[a] court's decision whether to grant an evidentiary hearing is subject to de novo ... ...
-
Wharen v. State, 5D14–4359.
...prepared at public expense on behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to him without charge for copying. Rosado v. State, 1 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). However, a defendant is not entitled to free copies of the entire file. Potts v. State, 869 So.2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 2d DC......