Rosado v. Wyman, No. 69 Civ. 355.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation304 F. Supp. 1354
PartiesJulia ROSADO, Lydia Hernandez, Majorie Miley, Sophia Abrom, Ruby Gathers, Louise Lowman, Eula Mae King, Cathryn Folk, Annie Lou Phillips, and Majorie Duffy, individually, on behalf of their minor children, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. George K. WYMAN, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of Social Services for the State of New York, and the Department of Social Services for the State of New York, Defendants.
Decision Date12 May 1969
Docket NumberNo. 69 Civ. 355.

304 F. Supp. 1354

Julia ROSADO, Lydia Hernandez, Majorie Miley, Sophia Abrom, Ruby Gathers, Louise Lowman, Eula Mae King, Cathryn Folk, Annie Lou Phillips, and Majorie Duffy, individually, on behalf of their minor children, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
George K. WYMAN, individually and in his capacity as Commissioner of Social Services for the State of New York, and the Department of Social Services for the State of New York, Defendants.

No. 69 Civ. 355.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 12, 1969.


Lee A. Albert, Henry A. Freedman, Sylvia Ann Law, Nancy Duff Levy, Robert P. Borsody, New York City, Center on Social Welfare Policy and Law.

Carl Rachlin, James Spitzer, David Draschler, Gen. Counsel, New York City, National Welfare Rights Organization, Scholarship, Education and Defense Fund, Inc.

Martin Garbus, New York City, Roger Baldwin Foundation of American Civil Liberties Union, Ronald Bevil, Bruce Ferguson, Jonathan Marsh, of counsel.

Burt Neuborne, New York City, New York Civil Liberties Union, Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of New York, New York City, for defendants, Philip Weinberg, Amy Juviler, New York City, of counsel.

J. Lee Rankin, Corp. Counsel of City of New York, New York City, amicus curiae, Robert E. Hugh, Phyllis Roberts, New York City, of counsel.

Morris H. Schneider, County Atty. of Nassau County, Mineola, N. Y., amicus curiae, A. Thomas Levin, Mineola, N. Y., of counsel.

Vincent T. McCarthy, U. S. Atty., for Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., amicus curiae, for Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Harold Stevens, New York City, of counsel.

David Gilman, Gen. Counsel, New York City, City-Wide Coordinating Committee of Welfare Groups, MFY Legal Services Inc.

Cesar Perales, Williamsburg Legal Services, Brooklyn, N. Y., for Julia Rosado.

304 F. Supp. 1355

Virginia Schuler, Brooklyn, N. Y., Brownsville Legal Services, for Cathryn Folk and Eula Mae King.

Edward V. Sparer, Yale Law School, New Haven, Conn., Harold J. Rothwax, David A. Diamond, Marianne J. Rosenfield, Eric Hirschhorn, New York City, MFY Legal Services Inc., Mort P. Cohen, South Brooklyn Legal Services, Brooklyn, N. Y., for Lydia Hernandez.

Morton Friedman, St. Albans, N. Y., for Annie Lou Phillips and Majorie Duffy.

Philip Sokol, New York City, of counsel, for Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York.

Dorothy J. Coyle, New York City, of counsel, for Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of New York.

Mildred A. Shanley, Brooklyn, of counsel, for Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Brooklyn.

Louis Agin, New York City, of counsel, for Federation of Protestant Welfare Agencies.

Before MOORE, Circuit Judge,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 practice notes
  • Rosado v. Wyman, No. 69 Civ. 355.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • June 18, 1969
    ...392 U.S. at 312, n. 3, 88 S.Ct. at 2131. Since plaintiffs equal protection claim is no longer before this Court (Rosado v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 1354 (E.D.N.Y.1969) (per curiam opinion of three-judge court)), we must confront the question of our jurisdiction to decide the federal statutory cla......
  • Rosado v. Wyman, No. 711
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 16, 1969
    ...from an order and a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granting a preliminary injunction, 304 F.Supp. 1354 (1969), and a permanent injunction, ___ F.Supp. ___ (1969), against enforcement of Section 131-a of the New York Social Services Law, McK......
  • Jefferson v. Hackney 8212 5064, No. 70
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • May 30, 1972
    ...a more equitable basis.' 397 U.S., at 412—413, 90 S.Ct., at 1218. These conclusions led us to reject the holding of the District Court, 304 F.Supp. 1354, 1377, that Congress intended to prevent any reduction whatever in AFDC payments, and to reject the argument of the welfare recipients tha......
  • 42 249 Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union 8212 858, No. 73
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1974
    ...would benefit from the normal appellate review available to single-judge cases in the courts of appeals. 18. See Rosado v. Wyman, D.C., 304 F.Supp. 1354, appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 826, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 739; Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Comm'n, D.C., 284 F.Supp. 950, vacated to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Rosado v. Wyman, No. 69 Civ. 355.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • June 18, 1969
    ...392 U.S. at 312, n. 3, 88 S.Ct. at 2131. Since plaintiffs equal protection claim is no longer before this Court (Rosado v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 1354 (E.D.N.Y.1969) (per curiam opinion of three-judge court)), we must confront the question of our jurisdiction to decide the federal statutory cla......
  • Rosado v. Wyman, No. 711
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 16, 1969
    ...from an order and a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granting a preliminary injunction, 304 F.Supp. 1354 (1969), and a permanent injunction, ___ F.Supp. ___ (1969), against enforcement of Section 131-a of the New York Social Services Law, McK......
  • Jefferson v. Hackney 8212 5064, No. 70
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • May 30, 1972
    ...a more equitable basis.' 397 U.S., at 412—413, 90 S.Ct., at 1218. These conclusions led us to reject the holding of the District Court, 304 F.Supp. 1354, 1377, that Congress intended to prevent any reduction whatever in AFDC payments, and to reject the argument of the welfare recipients tha......
  • 42 249 Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union 8212 858, No. 73
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1974
    ...would benefit from the normal appellate review available to single-judge cases in the courts of appeals. 18. See Rosado v. Wyman, D.C., 304 F.Supp. 1354, appeal dismissed, 395 U.S. 826, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 739; Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Comm'n, D.C., 284 F.Supp. 950, vacated to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT