Rose v. City of Riverside, No. WD
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | HANNA |
| Citation | 827 S.W.2d 737 |
| Decision Date | 10 March 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. WD |
| Parties | Shirley ROSE, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE, Missouri, Respondent. 43944. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Shade v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n, No. WD 58652.
...applies to inverse condemnation claims, without stating which specific subsection of the statute applies. Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 738 (Mo.App. W.D.1992); Don Roth Dev. Co., Inc. v. Mo. Highway & Transp. Comm'n, 668 S.W.2d 177, 179 (Mo.App. E.D.1984); see also Lewis v.......
-
Bellwether Props., LLC v. Duke Energy Ind., LLC, No. 53A04–1511–CT–1880.
...and afford the citizenry a reasonable opportunity to familiarize itself with its terms and to comply."); Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 738 (Mo.App.1992)("Even if he did not have actual notice, everyone is conclusively presumed to know the law and that presumption appl......
-
Dwyer v. Meramec Venture Associates, L.L.C., No. ED 80173.
...their answers to include the discharge in bankruptcy defense, we find the defense sufficiently raised. See Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737 (Mo.App....
-
Cox v. Ripley County, No. SD29740
...Heins and Green, the Western District of our Court applied the principles later announced in those cases in Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Mo.App. 1992). In Rose, the appellant claimed that the respondent's affirmative defense of the statute of limitation was waived, in tha......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Shade v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n, No. WD 58652.
...applies to inverse condemnation claims, without stating which specific subsection of the statute applies. Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 738 (Mo.App. W.D.1992); Don Roth Dev. Co., Inc. v. Mo. Highway & Transp. Comm'n, 668 S.W.2d 177, 179 (Mo.App. E.D.1984); see also Lewis v. Cit......
-
Bellwether Props., LLC v. Duke Energy Ind., LLC, No. 53A04–1511–CT–1880.
...law, and afford the citizenry a reasonable opportunity to familiarize itself with its terms and to comply."); Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 738 (Mo.App.1992)("Even if he did not have actual notice, everyone is conclusively presumed to know the law and that presumption applies t......
-
Dwyer v. Meramec Venture Associates, L.L.C., No. ED 80173.
...their answers to include the discharge in bankruptcy defense, we find the defense sufficiently raised. See Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737 (Mo.App....
-
Cox v. Ripley County, No. SD29740
...Heins and Green, the Western District of our Court applied the principles later announced in those cases in Rose v. City of Riverside, 827 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Mo.App. 1992). In Rose, the appellant claimed that the respondent's affirmative defense of the statute of limitation was waived, in tha......
Request a trial to view additional results