Rosenbower v. Schuetz
| Decision Date | 12 April 1895 |
| Docket Number | 17,203 |
| Citation | Rosenbower v. Schuetz, 141 Ind. 44, 40 N. E. 256 (Ind. 1895) |
| Parties | Rosenbower v. Schuetz et al |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Lake Circuit Court.
The judgment is affirmed.
J. B Peterson, for appellant.
J Kopelke, for appellees.
This action was by the appellees to quiet the title to certain real estate in Lake county. Originally the appellant assigned errors in overruling his motion for a new trial and "in rendering judgment in said cause upon the plaintiffs complaint, for the reason that said complaint did not and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a good cause of action." Because of a defect of parties, in failing to join as appellant the Anderson Freeman Ice Company, the appellant sought and obtained leave to file an amended assignment of error. Accompanying the petition for such leave, and filed with it, was an amended assignment of error in which the only alleged error assigned was in the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The amended assignment of error was not filed subsequent to the granting of such permission and has never been made "on the transcript or upon some paper attached thereto," as required by rule numbered three of the rules of this court. Treating the original assignment as that upon which the appeal must be considered we find that the appellant has no standing in court because of the requirement that he should have brought in, by such assignment, the said Anderson Freeman Ice Company, a party defendant to the action, and one against whom, in connection with the appellant, the judgment of the circuit court was rendered. State v Hodgin, 139 Ind. 498, 39 N.E. 161.
If we should accept the original assignment of error as including the necessary parties, which, of course, we can not do, it is doubtful if the second specification of such assignment presents any question. It will be observed that it does not assign as error any...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Paxton v. Paxton, 2-980A298
...record. Dahlberg v. Ogle, (1977) 266 Ind. 524, 364 N.E.2d 1174; Bailey v. State, (1934) 206 Ind. 547, 188 N.E. 575; Rosenblower v. Schuetz, (1894) 141 Ind. 44, 40 N.E. 256; Taylor v. Butt, (1972) 154 Ind.App. 196, 289 N.E.2d 159. See Stewart v. State, (1980) Ind., 402 N.E.2d 973 (burden of ......
-
Shea v. The City of Muncie
... ... purports to be instructions, and then the judge's ... certificate and signature. The case of Rosenbower v ... Schuetz, 141 Ind. 44, 40 N.E. 256, cited by ... appellee's counsel in support of their contention, was a ... case where the only ... ...
-
Shea v. City of Muncie
...and then follows what purports to be instructions, and then the judge's certificate and signature. The case of Rosenbower v. Schuetz, 141 Ind. 44, 40 N. E. 256, cited by appellee's counsel in support of their contention, was a case where the only statement that the bill contained all the ev......
-
Harrison v. Western Construction Company
... ... question is not an open one. Vordermark v ... Wilkinson (1895), 142 Ind. 142, 39 N.E. 441; ... Rosenbower v. Schuetz (1895), 141 Ind. 44, ... 40 N.E. 256; Gregory v. Smith (1894), 139 ... Ind. 48, 38 N.E. 395; Michigan Mut. Life Ins. Co. v ... Frankel ... ...