Rosenthal v. Kurtz, 232

Decision Date02 April 1974
Docket NumberNo. 232,232
Citation62 Wis.2d 1,216 N.W.2d 252
PartiesImre J. ROSENTHAL et al., d/b/a Lewis Center-Joint Venture, Appellants, v. Kenneth C. KURTZ et al., Respondents, Insulation Service, Inc., et al., Defendants.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendants have based a motion for rehearing, in part, on their assertion that sec. 893.155, Stats., is constitutional. Contrary to the defendants' apprehensions, however, the court did not find the statute unconstitutional. The court noted that neither party had standing to raise the constitutional issue, and the court expressly avoided an interpretation of sec. 893.155 that could raise the constitutional issue.

The motion for rehearing is denied without costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Estate of Makos by Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1997
    ...grounds, Hansen v. A.H. Robins, Inc., 113 Wis.2d 550, 335 N.W.2d 578 (1983); Rosenthal v. Kurtz, 62 Wis.2d 1, 8, 213 N.W.2d 741, 216 N.W.2d 252 (1974) (discussing possible application of art. I, § 9). In addition, this conclusion is supported by decisions from other jurisdictions, in which ......
  • Regents of University of California v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1976
    ...Millwork Corp. v. Square D Co. (1975) 66 Wis.2d 382, 225 N.W.2d 454; and note Rosenthal v. Kurtz (1974) 62 Wis.2d 1, 213 N.W.2d 741 and 216 N.W.2d 252.17 Carter v. Hartenstein (1970) 248 Ark. 1172, 455 S.W.2d 918 [appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question (1971) 401 U.S. 9......
  • Yotvat v. Roth
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • January 23, 1980
    ...of action is a right which is protected by both constitutional provisions. Rosenthal v. Kurtz, 62 Wis.2d 1, 8, 12, 213 N.W.2d 741, 216 N.W.2d 252 (1974). Ocampo v. Racine, 28 Wis.2d 506, 513, 137 N.W.2d 477, 481, held that compliance with a statute requiring a notice of injury to a municipa......
  • Plant v. R. L. Reid, Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1975
    ...588, 591 (1967); Saylor v. Hall, 497 S.W.2d 218 (Ky.1973); Rosenthal v. Kurtz, 62 Wis.2d 1, 213 N.W.2d 741 (1974), rehearing denied 216 N.W.2d 252 (1974); Carr v. Miss. Valley Electric Co., 285 So.2d 301 (La.App.1973); Nevada Lakeshore Co. v. Diamond Electric Co., Inc., 89 Nev. 293, 511 P.2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT