Rosenthal v. United States
Decision Date | 07 March 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 3496.,3496. |
Citation | 18 F.2d 24 |
Parties | ROSENTHAL v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Louis E. Levinson, of Chicago, Ill., and Frank R. S. Kaplan, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff in error.
John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and James I. Marsh, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Allen L. Rosenthal was indicted, tried, and convicted for having used the mails to execute a scheme or artifice to defraud which he had devised.
The scheme consisted in advertising through newspapers, circulars, letters, etc., that he was the publisher of a Roberts' Masonic Directory which was then being compiled and would very shortly be ready for distribution. The following is a sample of the circular sent out by him:
In order to secure advertisers in these directories, the defendant prepared proposed advertisements and sent them through the United States mails. If the person who received one of these samples approved the proposed advertisement of his business, he returned it with $5 to pay for it. The defendant had two offices in the city of Boston, Mass., in which he employed about 30 girls who were engaged in preparing and mailing letters and circulars, containing suggested advertisements to prospective patrons. In doing this they cut out advertisements which they found in telephone books, directories, and other books from the various localities in which the directories were to be published. He also had an office in Rochester, N. Y., where 10 girls were engaged in doing the same kind of work. Some circulars were sent through the mails in stamped envelopes bearing the return address, some by express, and some by parcel post. About 70,000 circulars were prepared in the Boston office and thus sent to various localities. They were similar in all respects except name. For instance, those to be published in Pennsylvania were called "Roberts' Pennsylvania Masonic Directory," "Roberts' Pittsburgh Masonic Directory," etc. In order to secure advertisements, some circulars contained such statements as: Directories were to be published for Boston, New York City, Pittsburgh, the state of Pennsylvania, and elsewhere.
Admittedly the defendant did devise a scheme to publish Masonic directories and to secure advertisements to be published therein for which he received considerable money. Did he in good faith intend to publish such directories as his literature described, or did he not intend to do so and thus defraud those who paid for advertisements?
The scheme was devised prior to October 7, 1924, for on that date he wrote letters to various grand Masonic Lodges relative to publishing directories for Blue Lodges, etc., over which they had jurisdiction.
Some time thereafter, he sent out circulars saying this was the "last notice" and that advertising forms would "close positively December 18th"; that the directories were "now being...
To continue reading
Request your trial