Rosenwald v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Decision Date | 07 June 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 4116.,4116. |
Citation | 33 F.2d 423 |
Parties | ROSENWALD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Stuart Chevalier, of New York City, for appellant.
John Vaughan Groner, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EVANS and PAGE, Circuit Judges, and WHAM, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining the tax deficiency found against petitioner on his income tax returns for the years 1919, 1920, and 1921.
The question here is whether the dividends on stocks, interest upon a note, rents from real property, and coupons from Third Liberty Loan bonds, under the circumstances of this case, are taxable as income in the hands of petitioner.
In 1917 petitioner, with his wife, son, and son-in-law organized under the corporation laws of Illinois the Julius Rosenwald Fund (here called fund) for charitable, scientific, educational, and religious purposes, to be managed by four trustees, elected annually. The four incorporators have always been the trustees. Petitioner was elected president and treasurer. The by-laws required and empowered the treasurer to keep a bank account, and also provided that, with the consent of the petitioner, the treasurer "may keep a bank account and make disbursements therefrom under the name and style of `Julius Rosenwald.'" It is asserted, and not denied, that all funds were deposited in, and paid from, petitioner's personal account. It does not appear that otherwise than in the name of "Julius Rosenwald" the fund ever received or paid out any money.
In October, 1917, a gift that is not here in question was made to the fund by a letter that is important and is here set out:
The above provisions are made so that the said respective donees may not be suddenly deprived, by reason of my death, of the regular annual contributions which I have been making or may hereafter make or cause to be made to them, and are not intended to set a maximum upon the amounts which the Trustees, after my death, may, in their discretion, give to any of said donees.
"Dated October 31, 1917." "Yours truly, Julius Rosenwald."
The following gifts were also made by petitioner:
Continental Can Company Ederheiner, Stein Co. Brown Shoe Company National Cloak & Suit Co. Kabo Corset Company Consumers Company National Union Fire Insurance Co. Westinghouse Air Brake Company Independent Pneumatic Tool Company F. W. Woolworth Company Columbia Graphophone Manufacturing Co. American Graphophone Company Greenebaum Sons Bank & Trust Co. Hermann, Aukan & Co. Liberty Trust & Savings Bank.
There is evidence that petitioner clipped and delivered to the fund, before their maturity, interest coupons from Third Liberty Loan bonds.
The gifts were accepted. Petitioner immediately notified the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bell's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 12484
...States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on October 6, 1931; Copland v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 501; Rosenwald v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 33 F.2d 423; certiorari denied, 280 U.S. 599, 50 S.Ct. 69, 74 L.Ed. 644; Shellabarger v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 38 F.2d 566; Nelson v. Fe......
-
Galt v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...where title to the property remained in the assignor. Samuel V. Woods, 5 B.T.A. 413; Julius Rosenwald, 12 B.T.A. 350, affd. (C.A. 7) 33 F.2d 423, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 599; Ward v. Commissioner, (C.A. 9) 58 F.2d 757 (a 99-year lease); Oscar Mitchell, 27 B.T.A. 101; Arthur H. Van Brunt,......
-
Horst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
...holding that the amounts collected on the coupons were taxable as income to the petitioner. The Board refused to follow Rosenwald v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 33 F.2d 423, certiorari denied, 280 U.S. 599, 50 S.Ct. 69, 74 L.Ed. 644, where the facts were the same as in the present case. Rosenwald......
-
Becker v. Glenn, 1940.
...held by his wife. Compare Dulin v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 70 F.2d 828; Bardach v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 90 F.2d 323; Rosenwald v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 33 F.2d 423; Richardson v. Smith, 2 Cir., 102 F.2d Counsel for the respective parties will submit findings of fact and conclusions of law co......