Ross By and Through Ross v. City of Shawnee

Decision Date26 June 1984
Docket NumberNo. 59365,59365
Citation1984 OK 43,683 P.2d 535
PartiesJimmie Don ROSS, a minor, By and Through his father and natural guardian, Donnal ROSS, and Donnal Ross, Appellants, v. The CITY OF SHAWNEE, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Appeal from District Court of Pottawatomie County, Lloyd Henry, Judge.

Plaintiff sued for injuries received in a diving accident at a municipal swimming pool. Defendant sought summary judgment on grounds it received no notice within 120 days as provided by Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act. District Court granted summary judgment and plaintiff appeals.


Ed Able and Glen Mullins, Abel, Musser, Sokolosky & Clark, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

Paul McKinney, Shawnee, for appellee.

DOOLIN, Justice.

The questions presented for resolution involve interpretation of the Oklahoma "Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act." 51 O.S.1981, § 151 et seq. Specifically: (1) Does a city have "Notice" when two officials are informed of the "incident" but not the "claim"? (2) Must a minor comply with the 120-day notice provision? (3) Is the 120-day notice requirement constitutional as it relates to a minor?

Jimmie Ross was eight years old when he visited the Shawnee municipal swimming pool and fell from the high diving board to the concrete ledge on July 29, 1978. A formal notice of claim was filed with the Shawnee city clerk on July 25, 1980.

The Oklahoma Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act requires notice of a claim be filed with the clerk of the governing body of the political subdivision within 120 days after the loss occurs. 51 O.S.1981, § 156(B).

Jimmie Ross argues that notice requirement was met when private investigators discovered that the Shawnee City Manager learned of the diving accident on August 5, 1978, and Shawnee city attorney learned about the incident on August 17, 1978 when so informed by the investigators. This information is contained in the investigator's report to plaintiff's attorney which was filed in the case on November 5, 1982. As the trial court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment on May 6, 1981, and Plaintiff's motion for new trial was filed May 15, 1981, the investigator's report presumably was filed in conjunction with the new trial petition which was denied November 5, 1982. Thus the investigator's report was not before the trial court when it ruled on the motion for summary judgment.

Defendant argues this Court should not consider the investigator's report because it was not a part of the record when the trial court considered the issue of notice under the Tort Claims Act.

District Court Rule 13 (12 O.S. Ch. 2 App.) states that within ten days of the filing of a motion for summary judgment, the adverse party may file an objection to which he may attach "affidavits or other materials containing facts that would be admissible into evidence" which would, presumably, raise a matter in controversy which needs to be decided by the trier of fact, thus defeating a motion for summary judgment. Prior to the granting of summary judgment, the only affidavit filed by plaintiff was one stating that Jimmie Ross was a minor child.

In reviewing the grant or denial of summary judgment, this Court will examine the pleadings and evidentiary materials to determine what facts are material to plaintiff's cause of action, and to determine whether the evidentiary materials introduced indicate whether there is a substantial controversy as to one material fact and that this fact is in the movant's favor. All inferences and conclusions to be drawn from underlying facts contained in such materials as affidavits, admissions, depositions, pleadings, exhibits and the like, must be viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. See Weaver v. Pryor Jeffersonian, 569 P.2d 967 (Okl.1977).

Regarding the attempted presentation of material facts after the motion for summary judgment has been acted upon, we said in Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 529 P.2d 489 (Okl.1974).

Parties may not present new issues, arguments and authorities on appeal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
126 cases
  • Crawford ex rel. C.C.C. v. OSU Med. Trust
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • March 22, 2022
    ...School Bd. of Educ. , 656 P.2d 248 (Okla.1982), a minor was injured while on the school yard playing during recess. In Ross v. City of Shawnee , 683 P.2d 535 (Okla.1984), the minor received injuries at the municipal swimming pool. The minors were held to the same statute of limitations as a......
  • Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • April 17, 2001
    ...Ch. 15, App. 1. 21. Title 85 O.S.1991 § 12, see note 1, supra. 22. Minie v. Hudson, 1997 OK 26, ¶ 13, 934 P.2d 1082; Ross v. City of Shawnee, 1984 OK 43, ¶ 7, 683 P.2d 2001 OK CIV AP 53, ___ P.3d ___, 2000 WL 33313236, on March 29, 2001 in which certiorari was recalled as improvidently gran......
  • Myers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 2, 2002
    ...Ins. Co., 1989 OK 107, ¶ 7, 777 P.2d 932, 936; Frey v. Independence Fire and Cas. Co., 1985 OK 25, ¶ 6, 698 P.2d 17, 20; Ross v. City of Shawnee, 1984 OK 43, ¶ 8, 683 P.2d 535, 23. Rule 13, Rules for the District Courts of Oklahoma, 12 O.S.2001, Ch.2 App. 24. Cf. Towne v. Hubbard, 2000 OK 3......
  • FULTON v. PEOPLE LEASE Corp., 106
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • May 17, 2010
    ...and conclusions to be drawn from the evidentiary materials must be viewed in a light most favorable to Plaintiff. Ross v. City of Shawnee, 1984 OK 43, 683 P.2d 535. We are limited to the issues actually presented below, as reflected by the record which was before the trial court rather than......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT