Ross v. State, 1 Div. 913

Decision Date31 May 1991
Docket Number1 Div. 913
PartiesJudge ROSS, Jr. v. STATE
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court.

ON REMAND FROM ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

TYSON, Judge.

This cause is affirmed on authority of Ex parte Ross, 581 So.2d 495 (Ala.1991).

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 4, 2000
    ... ... a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must show (1) that his counsel's performance was deficient and (2) that he was ... ...
  • Samra v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 18, 1999
    ... ... Code 1975, as applied to attorneys who represent indigent defendants. 1 Specifically, he contends that the limitations of $1,000 for out-of-court ... ...
  • Hyde v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 30, 1998
    ... ... The murder was made capital 1) because it occurred during a burglary, see ? 13A-5-40(a)(4), Ala.Code ... 269, 98 L.Ed.2d 226 (1987).' ... " Guthrie v. State, 616 So.2d 913, 914 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (second bracketed language added [in Rieber ... ...
  • Loggins v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 30, 1999
    ... ... of murder committed during the course of a kidnapping, § 13A-5-40(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. Count II of the indictment charged Loggins with the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.
    • United States
    • Jones Law Review Vol. 12 No. 2, March 2008
    • March 22, 2008
    ...lawyer requested a recess between the guilt and penalty phases so he could read the state's death penalty statute. State v. Smith, 581 So. 2d 497 (Ala. Crim. App. (36) See Burdine v. Johnson, 231 F.3d 950, 962 (5th Cir. 2000), vacated by 234 F.3d 1339 (5th Cir. 2000) (rehearing allowed when......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT