Ross v. State
Decision Date | 21 June 1887 |
Citation | 10 A. 218,67 Md. 286 |
Parties | ROSS v. STATE. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the criminal court of Baltimore.
Wm. S. Bryan, Jr., and Charles A. Boston for appellant.
Atty. Gen. Roberts, for appellee.
The prisoner was tried and convicted on an indictment for the murder of Emily Brown, and the question is whether the confession of the prisoner, made to the marshal of police was admissible in evidence. On being brought to his office the marshal asked the prisoner where "he got the body that was taken by him to the college on Friday evening." The prisoner in reply having denied taking the body to the college, the marshal sent for Perry, who was also under arrest for the murder, and, as he approached the doorway, the marshal, pointing to the prisoner, asked Perry if "this was the man who brought the body," to which Perry replied, "Yes." Then, turning to the prisoner, the marshal said, The prisoner then made a statement as to where he got the body, and how much he paid for it, but before he finished it the marshal interrupted him, saying: Just about this time the marshal was called out of the room, and on his return was told that "the prisoner wanted to tell him all about it." He then said to the prisoner, "Go on and tell me about it." The latter hesitated, and, looking around, said, "I want to talk with Mr. O' Neil," who was the officer by whom he was arrested. O'Neil and the prisoner went into an adjoining room, and, returning a few minutes afterwards, O'Neil said to the marshal, "He wants to tell you all about it." Thereupon the marshal, turning to the prisoner, said, "Go on now, if you want to make your statement;" and the prisoner then made the confession offered in evidence. Now, in all this, it does not appear that any promise or inducement or threat or...
To continue reading
Request your trial