Ross v. State

Decision Date06 December 1972
Docket NumberNo. 45404,45404
CitationRoss v. State, 487 S.W.2d 744 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
PartiesMichael Don ROSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Charles W. Tessmer, Ronald L. Goranson, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., and W. T. Westmoreland, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Robert A Huttash, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for burglary with the intent to commit theft; the punishment, eight years imprisonment.

The indictment charges that the appellant'did by force, threats and fraud, break and enter a house . . .'

The jury was not charged on the theory of burglary alleged in the indictment, that it was committed by force, threats, fraud, or breaking and entering, but Only authorized the appellant's conviction if the appellant'did then and there enter a house then and there occupied and controlled by M. J. Sparks at night or in any manner enter a house then and there occupied and controlled by M. J. Sparks at any time, either day or night, and remain concealed therein with the intent in either case, then and there to fraudulently take therefrom corporeal personal property therein being and then belonging to the said M. J. Sparks . . .'

The charge erroneously authorized the appellant's conviction under a theory not charged in the indictment.Gooden v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 347, 145 S.W.2d 177(1940), Sullivan v. State, 13 Tex.App. 462(1883);Weeks v. State, 13 Tex.App. 466(1883)andPowell v. State, 12 Tex.App. 238(1882).Even though there was no objection to the charge at the time of trial, the error was fundamental and calculated to injure the rights of the appellant to the extent that he has not had a fair and impartial trial.SeeArticle 36.19, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.;Fennell v. State, 424 S.W.2d 631(Tex.Cr.App.1968)and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Hernandez v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 2020
    ..."calculated to injure the rights of the appellant to the extent that he has not had a fair and impartial trial.’ " Ross v. State , 487 S.W.2d 744, 745 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). As an intermediate appellate court, we are tasked with the duty to examine the record to discover fundamental errors......
  • Doyle v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 19, 1980
    ...a fair and impartial trial. The Court in Harris relied primarily on two cases to reach its conclusions. The first, Ross v. State, 487 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), does not support the Court's holding in Harris. In Ross, the court's instructions authorized the jury to convict the defendant ......
  • Lombard v. Lynaugh
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 6, 1989
    ...the absence of objection at trial normally did not obviate the requirement that the conviction be reversed. See, e.g., Ross v. State, 487 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Long v. State, 548 S.W.2d 897, 899 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); Robinson v. State, 553 S.W.2d 371, 374-75 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). 9 ......
  • Almanza v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 8, 1984
    ...v. State, 598 S.W.2d 274 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); White v. State, 610 S.W.2d 504 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Especially noteworthy is Ross v. State, 487 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), which states that fundamental error is error "calculated to injure the rights of the appellant to the extent that he has no......
  • Get Started for Free