Rowland v. Lepire
Decision Date | 27 September 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 11936,11936 |
Citation | 600 P.2d 237,95 Nev. 639 |
Parties | Glen E. ROWLAND, Martin L. Rowland and Rowland Corporation, Appellants, v. Eugene LEPIRE and Judy Lepire, Respondents. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Plaintiffs' counsel had default entered and later secured a default judgment against defendants without notice to their counsel who had requested additional time within which to file an answer.Such advantage should not have been taken without first inquiring about defense counsel's intention to proceed.Supreme Court Rule 187;1Nevada Ind. Guaranty v. Sturgeon, 80 Nev. 254, 391 P.2d 862(1964), concurring opinion.Accordingly, we annul the judgment entered below and remand for further proceedings.
1SCR 187:
2The Chief Justice designated Hon. Frank B. Gregory, Senior Judge, to sit in this case in place of the Hon. Cameron Batjer, Justice, who was disqualified.Nev.Const. art. 6, § 19;SCR 10.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Landreth v. Malik
...to inquire into the opposing party's intent to proceed before requesting a default under this court's holding in Rowland v. Lepire, 95 Nev. 639, 600 P.2d 237 (1979), and Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 3.5A. Generally, one notice of an intent to request a default is sufficient for purpos......
-
Landreth v. Malik
...intent to file a default. In addition, the district court did not address Malik's attorney's duties under Rowland v. Lepire, 95 Nev. 639, 640, 600 P.2d 237, 237-38 (1979), and RPC 3.5A (formerly SCR 175), which provides, "[w]hen a lawyer knows ... the identity of a lawyer representing an op......
- Langford v. State
-
Chrome Hearts, LLC v. Talulah
...without first inquiring about the opposing lawyer's intention to proceed." In support of its argument, Defendant cites Rowland v. Lepire, 600 P.2d 237 (Nev. 1979), in which the Nevada Supreme Court remanded to the district court an entry of default and default judgment that had been secured......