Royal Neighbors of America v. Lowary, 1027.
| Decision Date | 14 January 1931 |
| Docket Number | No. 1027.,1027. |
| Parties | ROYAL NEIGHBORS OF AMERICA v. LOWARY et al. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Montana |
Lewis A. Smith, of Butte, Mont., for plaintiff.
Wm. McKnight, of Reno, Nev., and A. J. Lowary, of Polson, Mont., for defendants.
August 1, 1930, complainant filed a bill of interpleader alleging it issued to Harry Lowary a benefit certificate in amount $1,000 payable to Mary, his wife, and, if she died prior to insured and no other beneficiary named, to his "legal heirs," without interest; that she died, he married Nelle, no change in beneficiary was made, and he died thereafter on June 16, 1929, in California, leaving a will devising all and "everything" to Nelle; that "timely" proofs of death were made, Nelle claims the entire amount by virtue of said will, and his two brothers claim $500 thereof, they three being the legal heirs. There are the usual allegations of inability to determine between these conflicting claimants, $1,000 were paid into court when bill filed, and the usual prayer to compel the said heirs defendants to interplead, and for costs and attorney's fees to complainant.
Nelle answers, claiming all, and the brothers that complainant has no excuse for not paying them the $500 they claim, that they are not responsible for the delay or costs or fees, and all ask particular and general relief. At this final hearing, the matter is submitted on the pleadings and complainant's by-laws, which provide that, in circumstances as here, the amount of the certificate shall be paid to the "next of kin" of insured in proportions to accord with the laws of the state of his residence at death, and that proofs of death must be filed in "reasonable time."
Although there is no evidence of the residence of insured at time of death, it appears admitted that the brothers' allegation that they are entitled to one-half and Nelle to one-half accords with the laws of the state of said residence.
Diverse citizenship existing, jurisdiction is conferred by paragraph 26, § 41, 28 US CA, but in all else the general principles of equity apply.
Accordingly, the court finds for defendants, one-half the recovery for Nelle, one-half for the two brothers. Interpleader is denied, for that: (1) Complainant knew or in ordinary diligence could have known to whom and in what proportions the amount of the certificate is payable, and it is well settled this defeats interpleader, even though any dissatisfied claimant might...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. Revere, Civ. A. No. 9952.
...Surety Co. of New York v. Calcasieu Oil Co., supra. 30 Calloway v. Miles, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 14, 15. See also, Royal Neighbors of America v. Lowary, D.C.D.Mont., 46 F.2d 565. 31 Holcomb v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 10 Cir., 228 F.2d 75, 82. 32 See Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.,......
-
United States v. McDonald Grain and Seed Company
...claim, it continues to run pending decision by the courts, if the delay is not the fault of either party." 3 See Royal Neighbors of America v. Lowary, D.C.Mont.1931, 46 F.2d 565, where, in denying statutory interpleader on the ground of laches, the court held that an insurance company after......
-
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Doran
...the use of ordinary diligence. Rather, this seems to be a resort to equity as a convenient escape from duty. Royal Neighbors of America v. Lowary, D.C. D.Mont.1931, 46 F.2d 565. It is true that the Company had a right to pursue its equitable remedy in interpleader to rid itself of the vexat......
-
Illinois Bankers Life Assur. Co. v. Blood
...delay to defeat the normal right of a stakeholder in this situation to recover costs and attorney's fees. In Royal Neighbors of America v. Lowary, D.C.Mont.1931, 46 F.2d 565, a delay of over twelve months in bringing the action was held to constitute laches defeating the plaintiff's right t......