Ruark v. Gunter
Decision Date | 06 March 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 91-1315,91-1315 |
Citation | 958 F.2d 318 |
Parties | Theodore RUARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank GUNTER, Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, of the State of Colorado, Respondents-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Theodore Ruark, pro se.
Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen. and Laurie A. Booras, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, Colo., for respondents-appellees.
Before SEYMOUR, ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. *
Petitioner-appellant Theodore Ruark appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. In 1963, Petitioner was convicted in a Colorado state court of escape, aggravated robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the escape conviction on appeal but reversed the aggravated robbery and assault convictions. See Ruark v. People, 158 Colo. 287, 406 P.2d 91 (1965). Petitioner is still serving time for the escape conviction as well as numerous other offenses for which sentences were imposed to run consecutively. He now claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the 1963 trial, but that he cannot adequately fashion a § 2254 petition because the state has denied him access to a trial transcript. The district court dismissed the federal habeas petition, holding that defendant had not stated a constitutional claim. We affirm.
On direct appeal, a trial transcript is an absolute matter of right for an indigent criminal defendant. See Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956). However, a § 2255 petitioner seeking collateral relief must demonstrate that his claim is not frivolous before the court is required to provide him with a free transcript. See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976) (Plurality) (28 U.S.C. § 753(f)) . Although the MacCollom Court dealt with a § 2255 federal petition, we think its reasoning is applicable to Petitioner's § 2254 action as well. See United States v. Delaware, 427 F.Supp. 72 (D.Del.1976) (28 U.S.C. § 2250) . The MacCollom Court expressly cited circuit court opinions which held that indigent petitioners seeking collateral relief did not have unlimited access to trial transcripts. 426 U.S. at 327 n. 5, 96 S.Ct. at 2092 n. 5. In one of those cases, Hines v. Barker, 422 F.2d 1002 (10th Cir.1970), we held that an indigent § 2254 petitioner does not have a constitutional right to access a free transcript in order to search for error. Id. at 1006-07 ( ).
Petitioner has not colored his ineffective assistance claims with any factual allegations. He merely states that his counsel was ineffective and that he needs a transcript to prove it. Such "naked allegations" are not cognizable under § 2254, and we are not compelled to allow Petitioner to conduct a search for error. See MacCollom, 426 U.S. at 326-27, 96 S.Ct. at 2092.
AFFIRMED.
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. McIntosh
...(under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), indigent defendant entitled to free copy of transcript on showing of particularized need); Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir. 1992) (prisoner does not have right to free transcript simply to search for error in record).VIII. Motion For Documents Without......
-
Bell v. Ludwick
...prepare for post-conviction collateral proceedings. See Rickard v. Burton, 2 F. App'x 469, 470 (6th Cir. 2001)(citing Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir.1992)); see also MacCollom, 426 U.S. at 325-26 (upholding constitutionality of statute limiting availability of free transcripts......
-
Gentry v. Deuth
...attacking a judgment of conviction where court finds that transcript is not needed to resolve issue presented); Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318 (10th Cir.1992) (applying MacCollom to § 2254 petitioner's For these reasons, the Court adopts the recommendation of the magistrate judge for the rea......
-
U.S. v. Stover
...that the petitioner "has no constitutional right to a transcript to prepare for a post-conviction proceeding."); Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir.1992) Stover also argues that the Court should issue a stay of his § 2255 proceedings while he challenges his state court convictions......
-
Review Proceedings
...Cir. 2000) (fee not refunded because fact that petitioner able to pay entire fee indicates it was “within his means”); Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir. 1992) (fee not waived for transcript where petitioner failed to prove claim nonfrivolous). 2921. See 18 U.S.C. § 3599(a)(2) (“......