Rubey v. Huntsman

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtBATES
Citation32 Mo. 501
PartiesTHOMAS P. RUBEY, Respondent, v. BENJAMIN HUNTSMAN, Appellant.
Decision Date31 July 1862
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Bush v. White
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1884
    ...in not reciting that the sale was not made at the court house door. 1 W. S., p. 609, sec. 42 and p. 612, sec. 55; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Reid v. Martin, 9 Mo. 878; Kane v. McCown, 55 Mo. 181; Strain v. Murphy, 49 Mo. 337; Allen v. Moss, 27 Mo. 354. The only remedy Trigg had, if any, ......
  • Cabell v. Grubbs
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • August 31, 1871
    ...N. Y., 86; Cook v. Hacklemann et al., 45 Mo. 317; Gibbons v. Steamboat Barker, 40 Mo. 253; Stierlin v. Daly, 37 Mo. 483; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Shaffner v. St. Louis, 31 Mo. 264; Farrar et al. v. Dean, 24 Mo. 16; Reeds v. Morton, 9 Mo. 287; Crook v. Peebly, 8 Mo. 344; Morton v. Reeds......
  • Standard Cattle Company v. Baird
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • April 3, 1899
    ...certainty for what he is taxed, are mandatory. (Black on Interpretation of Laws, 350-52; Black on Taxation, Sec. 227; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Rock v. Bridges, 45 Miss. 247; Mason v. Fearson, 9 How., 258; Doughty v. Hope, 2 Denio, 594; Deazie v. China, 50 Me. 518; Milford v. Orono, id.......
  • State ex rel. Ferguson v. Moss
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • April 30, 1879
    ...304; R. R. Co. v. Middlesex, 7 Met. 78; McCarrol's Lessee v. Weeks, 5 Hayw. (Tenn.) 246; Crandall v. James, 6 R. I. 144; Rubey v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; State ex rel. v. Maguire, 47 Mo 35. The power to annex penalties for the perpetration of frauds in taxation, is necessarily involved in the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Bush v. White
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 31, 1884
    ...in not reciting that the sale was not made at the court house door. 1 W. S., p. 609, sec. 42 and p. 612, sec. 55; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Reid v. Martin, 9 Mo. 878; Kane v. McCown, 55 Mo. 181; Strain v. Murphy, 49 Mo. 337; Allen v. Moss, 27 Mo. 354. The only remedy Trigg had, if any, ......
  • Cabell v. Grubbs
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • August 31, 1871
    ...N. Y., 86; Cook v. Hacklemann et al., 45 Mo. 317; Gibbons v. Steamboat Barker, 40 Mo. 253; Stierlin v. Daly, 37 Mo. 483; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Shaffner v. St. Louis, 31 Mo. 264; Farrar et al. v. Dean, 24 Mo. 16; Reeds v. Morton, 9 Mo. 287; Crook v. Peebly, 8 Mo. 344; Morton v. Reeds......
  • Standard Cattle Company v. Baird
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • April 3, 1899
    ...certainty for what he is taxed, are mandatory. (Black on Interpretation of Laws, 350-52; Black on Taxation, Sec. 227; Ruby v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; Rock v. Bridges, 45 Miss. 247; Mason v. Fearson, 9 How., 258; Doughty v. Hope, 2 Denio, 594; Deazie v. China, 50 Me. 518; Milford v. Orono, id.......
  • State ex rel. Ferguson v. Moss
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • April 30, 1879
    ...304; R. R. Co. v. Middlesex, 7 Met. 78; McCarrol's Lessee v. Weeks, 5 Hayw. (Tenn.) 246; Crandall v. James, 6 R. I. 144; Rubey v. Huntsman, 32 Mo. 501; State ex rel. v. Maguire, 47 Mo 35. The power to annex penalties for the perpetration of frauds in taxation, is necessarily involved in the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT