Rude v. Nass
Decision Date | 17 March 1891 |
Citation | 48 N.W. 555,79 Wis. 321 |
Parties | RUDE v. NASS. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Grant county.
It appears from the record that the defendant has been a minister in various Norwegian Lutheran Churches ever since 1866. That at the time of the trial the plaintiff was 31 years of age, and had been a teacher of vocal music for several years at various places. That from the spring of 1884 until some time in 1885 he led the singing in one of the defendant's congregations, and also taught singing school at the same place or in the vicinity. That in the fall of 1885 he went to Crawford county, and in the early spring of 1886 to Washington Prairie, Winnesheik county, Iowa, where he continued his vocation. That while there, and on July 26, 1886, he was arrested and brought before a justice of the peace on the charge of having willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously seduced, debauched, and carnally known a daughter of the complainant, an unmarried female of previous chaste character. That under date of July 30, 1886, a letter, of which the following is a copy, was written in behalf of the father of the girl, and sent from said Washington Prairie to the defendant at Boscobel, Wis., to-wit: That in answer to that letter, and under date of August 3, 1886, the defendant wrote in the Norwegian language, and sent from Boscobel, to the person named, at said Washington Prairie, a letter of which the following is a copy, to-wit: That July 28, 1888, the plaintiff commenced this action of libel, based upon the letter so written by the defendant. That the answer of the defendant admits the writing and sending of the letter, but denies that he was actuated by malice or ill will towards the plaintiff, and alleges the facts and circumstances under which the letter was written and sent, and that the letter was a privileged communication, made in good faith, and in the full belief of its truth; and also, in justification thereof, alleged that the communication was true, and pleaded specially the facts and circumstances showing its truth. At the close of the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cornelius v. Cornelius
...193 Mass. 559; Atwill v. Mackintosh, 120 Mass. 183; Laughlin v. Schnitzer, 106 S.W. 909; Buisson v. Huard, 106 La. Ann. 776; Rude v. Noss, 79 Wis. 327; Railsback v. Railsback, 12 Ind.App. 663. instruction 15 as asked by defendant, he assumed that, although his statements were made "at the r......
-
Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.
...v. Journal Co., 204 Wis. 132, 235 N.W. 442 (1931).12 Johnson v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co., 197 Wis. 432, 222 N.W. 451 (1928); Rude v. Nass, 79 Wis. 321, 48 N.W. 555 (1891). See also: Hett v. Ploetz, 20 Wis.2d 55, 121 N.W.2d 270 (1963).13 Restatement (Second) of Torts, sec. 594 (1977).14 Ranous ......
-
Ex parte Newbern
...of Gasquet, 136 La. 957, 68 So. 89, 92); one who has lost the ability, through drink, to manage his own affairs (Rude v. Nass, 79 Wis. 321, 48 N.W. 555, 558), and as one who is drunk more often, literally, than not (Tatum v. State, supra, 22 So.2d 350, 351). It may easily be seen from the f......
-
Polk v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
...the communication. 56 Am. St. Rep. 170 and note; 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1102; 86 Am. Dec. 84; 76 N.W. 961; 21 A. 154; 39 A. 4; 70 S.W. 607; 48 N.W. 555. And the party making the statement protected, if it is made to a party having a corresponding interest, even though it contains matter which,......