Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

Decision Date10 November 1986
PartiesRudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co. 85-5722
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

S.D.Fla., 800 F.2d 1040

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Economic Dev. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 2, 1996
    ... ... DMC was the sole general partner of DRLP. The DRLP limited partners were a group of individual American investors including several Hollywood celebrities. See generally Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.) (vacating district court's dismissal of securities fraud claims against AA by DRLP limited partners and DRLP liquidating trustee), reh'g denied, 806 F.2d 1070 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946, 107 S.Ct. 1604, 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987); ... ...
  • Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co.(USA)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 2, 1996
    ... ... See DRLP Private Placement Mem., Zirin Aff.Ex. 17 at 37. The limited partners never assigned their claims against AA to DMC or to the Trustee, and in fact prosecuted their own securities fraud action against AA. See Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 800 F.2d 1040 (11th Cir.), reh'g denied, 806 F.2d 1070 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 946, 107 S.Ct. 1604, 94 L.Ed.2d 790 (1987). It follows that the Trustee has no standing to assert the rights of the DRLP limited partners, and that summary judgment must be ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT