Ruff v. Montgomery

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCALHOON, J.
CitationRuff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184, 35 So. 465 (Miss. 1903)
Decision Date14 December 1903
PartiesJOSEPHUS F. RUFF v. WALTER R. MONTGOMERY

FROM the circuit court of Marshall county. HON. PERRIN H. LOWREY Judge.

Ruff appellant, was plaintiff, and Montgomery, appellee, was defendant in the court below. From a judgment in defendant's favor, plaintiff sought to appeal to the supreme court. The defects of the record upon which the supreme court acted in dismissing the appeal are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Appeal dismissed.

C. Lee Crum, for appellant.

W. A Belk, for appellee.

OPINION

CALHOON, J.

This record discloses no appeal bond from the court of the justice of the peace, nor any record of the proceedings in that court, and so the circuit court was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and therefore the appeal to this court must be dismissed. Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. 469. But, in the language of the opinion in that case, "we will reinstate the case if appellant will, by certiorari, complete his record, but on the condition that the appellant shall pay all the costs of the appeal to this court."

Appeal dismissed.

[Afterward the record having been perfected, the case was again docketed, heard, and submitted, and a decision rendered on the merits. See Ruff v....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Waits v. Black Bayou Drainage Dist
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1939
    ...744, 150 So. 760; Brasham v. State, 140 Miss. 712, 106 So. 280; Rodgers v. City of Hattiesburg, 99 Miss. 639, 55 So. 481; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184, 35 So. 465; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So. Gardner v. R. R. Co., 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. 469; McPhail v. Blaun, 95 Miss. 53, 48 So. ......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1929
    ...duty of getting a true and correct record before the court. Ex parte Golding, 114 So. 385; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 640; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184; Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291; Crapoo Grand Gulf, 9 S. & M. 205; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 643, 29 So. 470; City of Pass Chr......
  • Brasham v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1925
    ... ... that this court is without jurisdiction. Rodgers v. City ... of Hattiesburg, 55 So. 481; Ruff v. Ontgomery, ... 36 So. 465, 83 Miss. 184; Ball v. Sledge, 35 So ... 214, 82 Miss. 747; Gardner v. R. R. Co., 29 So. 469, ... 78 Miss. 640; ... often been decided by this court. Rodgers v ... City of Hattiesburg, 99 Miss. 639, 55 So. 481; ... Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184, 35 So ... 465; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So ... 214; Gardner v. R. R. Co. 78 Miss. 640, 29 ... So. 469; McPhail v. Blaun, ... ...
  • Xydias v. Pellman
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1920
    ... ... The question of jurisdiction can be raised ... at any time." In support of this holding there is cited ... in the above opinion Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss ... 184, 35 So. 465; and Bal v ... Sledge, 83 Miss. 747, 35 So. 214; Gardner ... v. Railroad Company, 78 Miss. 640, 29 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free