Rugiero v. Dinardo, Docket Nos. 145577
Decision Date | 03 April 2013 |
Docket Number | 302963,303259,302192,COA Nos. 301829,145581,307630.,302228,145582,145583,145584.,145580,145578,302936,303707,Docket Nos. 145577,145579 |
Citation | 828 N.W.2d 380,493 Mich. 957 |
Parties | Patrick A. RUGIERO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Antonietta M. DINARDO, Defendant–Appellee. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Prior report: Mich.App., 2012 WL 2335933.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals related to the imposition of attorney fees, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing regarding whether the fees granted in the court's earlier interim awards pursuant to MCR 3.206(C) should be imposed as a final matter or otherwise modified as the evidence and circumstances may warrant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beek v. City of Wyo., Docket No. 145816.
...493 Mich. 957828 N.W.2d 381John TER BEEK, Plaintiff–Appellee,v.CITY OF WYOMING, Defendant–Appellant.Docket No. 145816.COA No. 306240.Supreme Court of Michigan.April 3, Prior report: 297 Mich.App. 446, 823 N.W.2d 864.Order On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3......
- Rugiero v. Dinardo, Docket Nos. 145577