Rush v. Gordon
Decision Date | 11 February 1888 |
Citation | 38 Kan. 535,16 P. 700 |
Parties | H. D. RUSH, et al., v. WILLIAM GORDON |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Error from Leavenworth District Court.
ON or about February 1, 1882, H. D. Rush recovered a judgment in the district court of Leavenworth county against William Gordon upon an account for flour, for the sum of $ 2,338.56 and costs of suit. About May 8, 1883, an execution was issued on such judgment, and at the instance of Rush was levied by John W. Prest, the sheriff of Leavenworth county, upon lots 6 and 7, in block 24, in Leavenworth city; said lots being the property of the said William Gordon. The sheriff then advertised that he would sell said lots on June 18, 1883. On June 13, 1883, William Gordon commenced this action in the said district court, against Rush and Prest, to perpetually enjoin and restrain them from selling said lots, upon the ground that the lots were the plaintiff's homestead, and were exempt from execution or judicial sale. The defendants answered, and the plaintiff replied. On July 5, 1884, the case was tried before the court without a jury, and the court made the following findings and conclusions, to wit:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Guckenheimer
... ... Bebb v ... Crowe, 39 Kan. 342, 18 P. 223. See, also, Hogan v ... Manners, 23 Kan. 551, 33 Am. Rep. 199; Rush v ... Gordon, 38 Kan. 535, 16 P. 700; Layson v ... Grange, 48 Kan. 440, 29 P. 585. Though it was held in ... Ashton v. Ingle, 20 Kan. 670, ... ...
-
In re Stone
... ... his homestead as soon as he attempts to make any part of it ... helpful in family expenses." ... To the ... same effect, see Rush v. Gordon, 38 Kan. 535, 16 P ... 700; In re Ogburn's Estate, 105 Cal. 95, 38 P ... 498; Orr v. Shraft, 22 Mich. 260; Groneweg v ... Beck, 93 ... ...
-
Anderson v. Shannon
... ... homestead character which had previously attached. Hixon ... v. George, 18 Kan. 253; Rush v. Gordon, 38 Kan ... 535, 16 P. 700; Hoffman v. Hill, 47 Kan. 611, 28 P ... 623; Pitney v. Eldridge, 58 Kan. 215, 48 P. 854; ... Iola ... ...
-
State ex rel. Apt v. Mitchell
...law. (Anderson v. Shannon, 146 Kan. 704, 710, 73 P.2d 5, 114 A.L.R. 200; Bebb v. Crowe, 39 Kan. 342, 346, 18 P. 223; Rush v. Gordon, 38 Kan. 535, 16 P. 700.) The state urges we adopt the view taken by other jurisdictions relating to the homestead in cases involving liquor violations. We hav......
-
Kansas Homestead Law
...556 (1965) (an incidental departure for business purposes does not deprive residence of its homestead character). [FN59]. Rush v. Gordon, 38 Kan. 535, 16 P. 700 (1888). See also Hogan v. Manners, 23 Kan. 551 (1880) (evidence supported finding of use as residence even though part of house us......