Rusk State Hosp. v. Black

Docket Number10-0548
Decision Date31 August 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
411 cases
  • Zachry Constr. Corp. v. Port of Hous. Auth. of Harris Cnty.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 29 Agosto 2014
    ... ... Greer, Gibbs & Bruns LLP, Brandon Trent Allen, Reynolds, Frizzell, Black, Doyle, Allen & Oldham, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Douglas W. Alexander, ... , courts in all but one jurisdiction to consider the issue, and five state legislatureshad answered no. We agree with this overwhelming view and also ... Wichita Falls State Hosp. v. Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 696 (Tex.2003). While most damages awards ... 15 Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88, 95 (Tex.2012). 16 Fin. Comm'n of ... ...
  • Luttrell v. El Paso Cnty.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 20 Diciembre 2017
    ... ... We find that the petition as it currently stands does not state a valid cause of action for which the County's immunity was waived; ... CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 37.006(b)); Wichita Falls State Hosp ... v ... Taylor , 106 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Tex. 2003). However, the UDJA ... Sys ... v ... Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 835, 839 (Tex. 2007); see also Rusk State Hosp ... v ... Black , 392 S.W.3d 88, 96-97 (Tex. 2012) (citing ... ...
  • Residents Against Flooding v. Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 9 Mayo 2017
    ... ... lack of standing, Rule 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and, in the alternative, Rule 12(e) motion for more definite ... App.Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 11, 2016, no pet.), 14 citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black , 392 S.W.3d 88, 95 (Tex. 2012) ("When performing ... ...
  • Univ. of the Incarnate Word v. Redus
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 22 Mayo 2020
    ... ... Mateer, Austin, Kyle D. Hawkins, for Amicus Curiae State of Texas. Justice Bland delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ... Olivares , 461 S.W.3d 117, 121 (Tex. 2015) (citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black , 392 S.W.3d 88, 97 (Tex. 2012) (noting that ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 21-9 Attacking Subject Matter Jurisdiction
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Commercial Causes of Action Claims Title Chapter 21 Pleading Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Texas State Trial Courts*
    • Invalid date
    ...520 S.W.3d 28, 35 (Tex. 2017) (citing Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Marquez, 487 S.W.3d 538, 558 (Tex. 2016)); Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88, 103 (Tex. 2012).[64] Texas Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004).[65] Texas Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Mira......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT