Russ v. City of Detroit, Dept. of St. Rys.
| Decision Date | 16 May 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. 7,7 |
| Citation | Russ v. City of Detroit, Dept. of St. Rys., 53 N.W.2d 353, 333 Mich. 505 (Mich. 1952) |
| Parties | RUSS v. CITY OF DETROIT, DEPARTMENT OF STREET RYS. |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
W. J. McBrearty, Detroit, for appellant. James M. Wienner, Detroit, of counsel.
Leo A. Sullivan, Datroit, for appellee. James S. Shields, A. Albert Bonczak, Detroit, of counsel.
Before the Entire Bench.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages because of personal injuries received by him, caused by the sudden stopping of a city bus in which plaintiff was a passenger. At the conclusion of plaintiff's proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict. The court granted defendant's motion and entered judgment for the defendant accordingly. Plaintiff appeals.
On November 24, 1947, between 10 and 11 a. m., plaintiff boarded a bus operated by defendant, the department of street railways, at the southeast corner of Conner and Jefferson in Detroit. The bus was northbound. No other passenger boarded the bus with plaintiff. Plaintiff paid his fare and walked from the front end of the bus toward the back end to take the only vacant seat in the bus. As he walked, plaintiff held onto the backs of seats here and there. The bus came to a sudden stop.
Plaintiff testified as follows:
It is the claim of plaintiff that the driver of the bus was a student driver; that an instructor was on the bus for the purpose of instructing the driver while he was driving the bus; that just before the accident, the instructor was talking with the driver; that a passenger alighted from a streetcar in the intersection of Jefferson and Conner just before the bus entered the intersection, or just before the bus arrived at a point in the intersection from which the streetcar had just left; that the passenger shouted 'Hey' at the driver of the bus, who thereupon brought the bus to a stop that was improper and too sudden for the safety of the plaintiff.
Plaintiff's witness, Emeritt Sleed, testified that the passenger who had just alighted from the street car yelled at the bus, and testified further:
'Well, the instructor was talking to his partner--back seat driver I called him; he was sitting on the right side talking, with his back just like that (indicating). When this fellow yelled 'Hey', well this fellow stopped right here (indicating). He made a sudden stop; one of those things, you know; almost threw me out of my seat; I liked to fall on my face; and this old fellow, he fell. Well, he had almost got to the back door, but the old fellow fell backwards. When this fellow fell backwards, well, my friend and I ran and picked the fellow up, you know, and set him on the seat--side seat, approximately in there (indicating). Not to the back. The driver don't know what happened because he had his--well, the coach going this way (indicating...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Seldon v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Reg'l Transp.
...not recover for injuries sustained when the bus suddenly stopped because such stops are normal incidents of travel. Russ v. Detroit, 333 Mich. 505, 508, 53 N.W.2d 353 (1952); Sherman v. Flint Trolley Coach, Inc., 304 Mich. 404, 416, 8 N.W.2d 115 (1943); Zawicky v. Flint Trolley Coach Co., I......
-
Barnett v. City of Detroit
...v. Flint Trolley Coach, 1943, 304 Mich. 404, 8 N.W.2d 115; Burke v. Enders, 1943, 305 Mich. 270, 9 N.W.2d 537; Russ v. City of Detroit, 1952, 333 Mich. 505, 53 N.W.2d 353. 4. Of course, if there is any evidence of negligence aside from the unexplained sudden stop or start of the motor vehic......
-
Routhier v. City of Detroit
...of Detroit, 325 Mich. 644, 39 N.W.2d 212. The situation in the case at bar differs materially from that presented in Russ v. City of Detroit, 333 Mich. 505, 53 N.W.2d 353. There the plaintiff passenger on defendant's bus was denied recovery, the action being based wholly on the claim that d......
-
Cole v. Bland
...do not give rise to liability. See, e.g., Seldon, 297 Mich App at 437 (sudden stops are normal incidents of travel); Russ v Detroit, 333 Mich 505, 508; 53 NW2d 353 (1952) (a mere sudden stop does not create liability); Sherman v Flint Trolley Coach, Inc, 304 Mich 404; 416; 8 NW2d 115 (1943)......