Russ v. Russ

Decision Date20 February 1958
CitationRuss v. Russ, 171 N.Y.S.2d 862, 4 N.Y.2d 743 (N.Y. 1958)
Parties, 148 N.E.2d 911 Hugh McM. RUSS, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. Lavinia F. RUSS, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, 3 A.D.2d 888, 161 N.Y.S.2d 696.

Husband brought action against wife for separation, on ground of abandonment, and wife brought action for separation, on ground of alleged cruel and inhuman conduct, and the actions were consolidated.

The Supreme Court, Ontario County, Van Duser, Official Referee, entered judgment in favor of the husband, and the wife appealed.

The Appellate Division modified the judgment and held that evidence established that wife was justified in leaving husband, but that husband's conduct was not such that the wife was entitled to separation on ground of alleged cruel and inhuman treatment.

Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Goldstein, Judd & Gurfein, New York City (Orrin G. Judd, New York City, Charles S. Wilcox, Rochester, Robert J. Haft, New York City, and Victor T. Fuzak, Buffalo, of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent-appellant husba...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Camp v. Camp
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1959
    ...defense would not constitute grounds for a separation, but Russ v. Russ, 3 A.D.2d 888, 161 N.Y.S.2d 696, 697, affirmed w. o. 4 N.Y.2d 743, 171 N.Y.S.2d 862, establishes that a defense of justification under Civil Practice Act, § 1163 does not require proof rising to the level of cruel and i......
  • Sacks v. Sacks
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 20, 1966
    ...210; Axelrod v. Axelrod, 2 Misc.2d 79, 85, 150 N.Y.S.2d 633, 638; Russ v. Russ, 3 A.D.2d 888, 161 N.Y.S.2d 696, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 743, 171 N.Y.S.2d 862, 148 N.E.2d 911). Insofar as the award of alimony for defendant's support is involved, it must be noted that section 236 of the Domestic Relat......
  • Lind v. Lind
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 8, 1982
    ...N.Y.S.2d 686, 182 N.E.2d 291). Mere incompatibility is not enough (Russ v. Russ, 3 A.D.2d 888, 161 N.Y.S.2d 696, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 743, 171 N.Y.S.2d 862, 148 N.E.2d 911; see Mante v. Mante, 34 A.D.2d 134, 137, 309 N.Y.S.2d 944). Bald allegations of cruel and inhuman treatment must be corrobora......
  • Gladstone v. Gladstone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1962
    ...of separation in her favor predicated upon cruel and inhuman treatment. Russ v. Russ, 3 A.D.2d 888, 161 N.Y.S.2d 696, aff'd 4 N.Y.2d 743, 171 N.Y.S.2d 862. Neither party having established the right to a decree, they are left as they were when the litigation was instituted. Bohmert v. Bohme......
  • Get Started for Free