Russell v. Andrews

Citation120 Ala. 222,24 So. 573
PartiesRUSSELL v. ANDREWS ET AL.
Decision Date05 November 1898
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Appeal from circuit court, Barbour county; William A. Anderson Judge.

Ejectment by W. D. Andrews and another, as executors of the last will and testament of William A. Andrews, deceased, against John Collier. On suggestion that said Collier was in possession as tenant of L. A. Russell, the latter was made a defendant. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant Russell appeals. Reversed.

The cause was submitted for trial upon an agreed statement of facts. It appeared in this statement, that W. A. Andrews died in the year 1881, leaving a last will and testament. The provisions of the will material to this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion, with the exception of the seventh and eighth paragraphs, which are as follows: "Paragraph Seven. When my youngest child arrives at the age of twenty-one years, or when all of my children shall have married, then in either of said events my executrix and executor are directed to sell all of the real and personal property then held by them as such; except the home provided for my said wife and children by paragraph two of this my will, unless my said wife is then dead or some of my said children are minors or unmarried, on such terms as they may select, either for cash, or part cash and part on credit or wholly on credit; but if on credit then such credit shall not be over two years, and notes with security to be approved by them to be given by the purchaser or purchasers of said property. And the proceeds of said sale when all are collected shall be distributed by my said executrix and executor as follows: First. My said wife as to said distribution to be considered as one of my children and to receive a child's share of said proceeds absolutely and in her own right. And if a child's share so to be received by her does not amount to the sum of five thousand dollars, then and in that event, I direct my executrix and executor after deducting her share as above stated from said proceeds of sale, to take from the remainder of said proceeds of sale, an amount of money which with the amount of the child's share to be received by my said wife as herein stated absolutely, will make said sum of five thousand dollars. And said sum so taken to make up said sum of five thousand dollars, shall be invested by my executrix and executor in real or personal property and titles to such property taken in their names, and the rents, incomes, and profits of said property as they may accrue, to be paid over to my said wife during her lifetime. Second. The balance of said proceeds of said sale to be distributed equitably among all of my children, including my daughter Dora and my son William D., provided, however, that such child or children who shall have received an advance under paragraph six of this my will, shall on said distribution be charged up with such advance, and the legal interest thereon from the time said advance was so received, as a portion of such child or children's distributive share in my said estate. And such child or children so receiving said advance shall not be entitled to receive any further advance on his or her share until the child or children who have not received any advance or who have not received the full amount of said advance shall receive a sum of said proceeds of sale which taken by itself or being added to the amount which may have been previously advanced to her or him, including interest from the time said advance was so made, shall make all of said children equal, and then after all have been made equal, the balance to be distributed between them share and share alike.

"Paragraph Eight. If at the time said sale of the real and personal property is authorized to be made by executrix and executor under paragraph seven of this my will, my wife is still living, then my said executrix and executor are not to sell the house and tract of land to be provided for my said wife under paragraph second of this my will, but on the death of my said wife, if her said death occurs subsequently to the sale authorized under paragraph seven of this my will, my surviving executor is authorized and directed to sell said tract of land so provided for a house, and also the property in which the surplus to make up the sum of five thousand dollars was invested as by paragraph seven of this my will as he may deem best, but not on a credit of over twelve months. And the proceeds of said sale to be distributed between my children equitably and as directed by this paragraph of this my will."

After setting out the will at length, the agreed statement of facts then continues as follows: "The will was regularly probated in Barbour county, Alabama, on the _____ day of _____, 1881, and L. E. Andrews and W. D. Andrews entered upon their duties as executrix and executor of said will and are still acting in that capacity, the will not having yet been fully executed. Under the provisions of the will Dora Russell and her husband, L. A. Russell, entered into the possession of the lands sued for, the same being the residence and the eighty acres of the home place mentioned in said will, and in the year 1884, moved away from said lands and rented them to a tenant and received the rent therefrom. On February 11 1885, Dora Russell died leaving surviving her, her husband L. A. Russell, the defendant in this cause, and a son, James Alfred Russell. L. A. Russell for his said son continued to rent out said lands and receive the rents therefrom till August 10, 1895, when his said son, James Alfred Russell, died. L. A. Russell continued to rent out the lands till this suit was brought against his tenant John Collier and upon motion of L. A. Russell he is let in to defend." This was all the evidence in this case. Thereupon the court at the request of the plaintiffs, gave to the jury the following written charge: ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Galloway v. Sewell
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1924
    ... ... Van ... Duyne, 9 N.J.Eq. 259; Cross v ... Hock, [162 Ark. 633] 149 Mo. 325; Rountree ... v. Dixon, 105 N.C. 350, 11 S.E. 158; ... Russell v. Andrews, 120 Ala. 222, 24 So ... 573; and Warren v. Webb, 68 Me. 133 ...          Under ... this rule Martha L. Dickey was entitled ... ...
  • In re Estate of Fleshman
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1931
    ... ... (29 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 2d ed., 444; Cross v ... Hoch, 149 Mo. 325, 50 S.W. 786; Russell v ... Andres, 120 Ala. 222, 24 So. 573; Ewell v ... Stewart, 110 Kan. 218, 203 P. 922; Special School ... Dist. No. 5 v. State, 139 Ark. 263, ... ...
  • Andrews v. Russell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1900

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT