Rutkin v. Rutkin, 76-2206
| Decision Date | 03 May 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-2206,76-2206 |
| Citation | Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400 (Fla. App. 1977) |
| Parties | Norman RUTKIN, Appellant, v. Sondra RUTKIN, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
A. John Goshgarian, Miami Beach, and Howard Hochman, Miami, for appellant.
Sondra Rutkin Alexander, in pro. per.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and HAVERFIELD and HUBBART, JJ.
This is an action for modification of a marriage dissolution decree in which the wife sought to have the marital home sold.The trial court ordered the sale and distributed the proceeds.The husband appeals from the distribution.
The issue presented for review is whether a husband, who subsequent to a marriage dissolution has reduced the mortgage principal on a marital home jointly held with his ex-wife as tenants in common, is entitled to a credit for the mortgage principal reduction allocable to his ex-wife's interest therein to be charged upon sale of the home against the ex-wife's share of the proceeds from the said sale.We hold that the husband is entitled to such a credit as computed and reverse.
On July 22, 1971, a final judgment was entered dissolving the marriage of Norman and Sondra Rutkin and giving the husband custody of the parties' minor children.The husband was also given the marital home to reside therein with the children based on the stipulation that he pay the mortgage payments on the marital home.The final order of marriage dissolution provided that upon sale of the marital home 'for the period that the husband pays the said mortgage payments, He shall be entitled to a credit for any portion of the principal of said mortgage indebtedness allocable to the wife's interest to be determined and allowed upon sale of the property.'
On August 8, 1975, the wife filed a petition for modification of the marriage dissolution judgment seeking among other things that the marital home be sold.After referring the matter to a special master, the trial court affirmed the subsequent report of the special master and ordered that the husband sell the home under certain stipulated conditions not material here.The trial court further ordered that the husband should be given a credit for the total mortgage principal reduction allocable to the wife's interest from the date of dissolution to the date of closing.
The marital home was subsequently sold for $32,406.30.It is undisputed that the husband reduced the mortgage principal allocable to the wife's interest from the date of the marriage dissolution to the date of closing in the amount of $3,486.40 and is entitled to a credit in that amount.
The husband petitioned the trial court for clarification as to the exact method by...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Vandegrift v. Vandegrift
...So.2d 1021 (Fla.3d DCA1981), dismissed, 412 So.2d 468 (Fla.1982); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 448 So.2d 1227 (Fla.2d DCA1984); Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400 (Fla.3d DCA1977).12 Hottman v. Hottman, 418 So.2d 304 (Fla.4th ...
-
Fischer v. Fischer
...1st DCA 1982); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Whiteley v. Whiteley, 329 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Lyons v. Lyons, 208 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA A trial judge may, ho......
-
Price v. Price, s. 79-1158
...of the home to a credit for the mortgage principal reduction allocable to his ex-spouses's interest in the home." Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The credit is chargeable against the ex-spouse's share in the proceeds of the sale. Rutkin v. Rutkin, supra ; Whiteley v......
-
Tinsley v. Tinsley
...So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So. 2d 778 (Fla.1981); Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The fact that possession of the marital home is awarded to one spouse as a part of alimony or maintenance has no effect ......