Ry. Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mut. Aid & Ben. Ass'n v. Robinson
| Decision Date | 27 October 1893 |
| Citation | Ry. Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mut. Aid & Ben. Ass'n v. Robinson, 147 Ill. 138, 35 N.E. 168 (Ill. 1893) |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
| Parties | RAILWAY PASSENGER & FREIGHT CONDUCTORS' MUT. AID & BEN. ASS'N v. ROBINSON. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from appellate court, third district.
Bill by Edward T. Robinson against the Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Association.Complaint obtained a decree, which was affirmed by the appellate court.38 Ill. App. 111.Defendant appeals.Affirmed.Miller, Starr & Leman, (John S. Miller, of counsel,) for appellant.
Scholes & Graham and John M. Palmer, for appellee.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by BAILEY, C. J.:
This was a bill in chancery, brought in the circuit court of Sangamon county, by Edward T. Robinson, executor of the last will and testament of James R. Robinson, deceased, against the Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Association, to enforce the payment by the association of the money claimed to have become payable upon the death of the complainant's testator.The bill alleges, in substance, that James R. Robinson, at the date of his will and at the time of his death, was a member of the defendant association, a corporation organized under the general incorporation laws of the state of Illinois.That the object and purpose of the association was to furnish pecuniary aid to the widows, heirs, devisees, and representatives of such members of the association as should die, or become permanently disabled; and that, in furtherance of this object, it was provided by its constitution and by-laws that in case of the death of a member, on proof of such death being furnished, it should assess and collect from each surviving member the sum of $2.50 for the benefit of the heirs or devisees or such deceased member, to be paid to him or them within 30 days from the collection of the assessment, provided that in no case should a greater sum than $2,500 be paid on account of such death.That James R. Robinson, on the 27th day of April, 1888, made and published his last will and testament, whereby, among other things, he bequeathed to the complainant his interest in his certificate of membership in the association, and directed that all moneys and benefits due thereunder should be paid to the complainant, and also appointed the complainant sole executor of his will.That, after making such will, James R. Robinson, on or about August 3, 1888, departedthis life.That on August 13, 1888, the will was duly admitted to probate by the county court of Sangamon county, and that letters testamentary were duly issued thereon to the complainant.That proofs of death were duly furnished to the association, and that a demand was made upon it for an assessment and payment to the complainant of the amount due him on the certificate of membership, but that the association, acting through its board of directors, wrongfully and without any just cause refused to make the assessment, or to pay the complainant the amount due on the certificate of membership, and still refuses so to do.That at the time of the death of James R. Robinson there were at least 1,350 members of the association, and that its membership has since been steadily increasing, so that an assessment made under its by-law would amount to much more than $2,500.That James R. Robinson, in his lifetime, complied fully with all the requirements and obligations resting upon him as a member of the association, and that it was the duty of the association to levy an assessment of $2.50 on each of its surviving members, and from the moneys thus realized to pay the complainant $2,500, with interest thereon from the time the assessment should have been made.The bill prays that the amount due on the certificate of membership in question be ascertained and determined by the court; that the defendant be required forthwith to levy and collect an assessment of $2.50 from each of its members, and pay the same, to the amount found due to him, to the complainant; and also a general prayer for relief.Attached to the bill as exhibit was a copy of the will of James R. Robinson, deceased, and also of the certificate of membership in question; the latter being as follows:
Upon this bill a summons was issued, directed to the sheriff of Cook county, and that summons was afterwards returned served by delivering a copy thereof to the defendant's secretary, its president not being found by the sheriff in his county.The defendant thereupon appeared, and filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, alleging, in substance, that the defendant was a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Illinois, and had its principal and only office in the city of Chicago, in the county of Cook; that the defendant does not reside in the county of Sangamon, and that the pretended service of summons upon it was made in the county of Cook, and not in the county of Sangamon, and that the defendant was not found or served with summons in the county of Sangamon.This plea, on argument, was disallowed and overruled, and the defendant was ruled to answer.In compliance with that rule, the defendant answered, admitting the issuing by the association to James R. Robinson of the certificate of membership in question, and also admiting that one of the objects and purposes of the association was to provide for the widows, children, heirs, or representatives of its members who might die or become permanently disabled, in such cases and events, and under such terms, conditions, and restrictions, and in such manner, as was provided by its constitution and by-laws; but alleging that the defendant was an association of railroad conductors, its membership being limited to persons of that vocation, and that the benefits extended to its members, or to their widows, children, heirs, or representatives, were only provided for by the constitution and by-laws of the association, and that no claim can therefore exist, except in case or when it arises under and in accordance with the constitution and by-laws, and on the terms, conditions, and restrictions therein provided.That by the constitution of the association it is, and while James R. Robinson was a member it was, prescribed as follows: The answer...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Grove
...St. Rep. 620, and cases cited; Robinson v. Templar Lodge, 117 Cal. 370, 49 Pac. 170, 59 Am. St. Rep. 198, and notes; Railway Assoc. v. Robinson, 147 Ill. 138, 38 N. E. 168. Upon the general question that there can be no agreement in advance of a controversy arising whereby the jurisdiction ......
-
Burchard v. Western Commercial Travelers Association
... ... Birnbaum, 116 Pa. St. 565; Benefit Assn. v ... Robinson, 147 Ill. 138, 35 N.E. 168; an Frank v. U ... S. Ben. Assn., 158 Ill. 560; Miles v. Mutual Reserve ... ...
-
Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Grove
... ... Ind.App. 123, 46 N.E. 477; People's Mut. Benefit ... Soc. v. Werner (1893), 6 ... St. 620, and cases cited; ... Robinson v. Templar Lodge, etc. (1897), 117 ... Cal ... St. 193 and notes; Railway ... Conductors, etc., Assn. v. Robinson (1893), 147 ... Ill ... 127; Niblack, Mut. Ben. Ins. § 337 ... It is ... ...
-
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Barnhill
... ... 1089, 81 ... Am.St.Rep. 613; Sweeney v. Ben. Soc., 14 Wkly. Notes ... Cas. (Pa.) 466; ... Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mut. Aid & ... Ben. v ... ...