Ryan v. Detrich, 10–1107.
| Decision Date | 16 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–1107.,10–1107. |
| Citation | 563 U.S. 984,179 L.Ed.2d 1206,131 S.Ct. 2449 (Mem) |
| Parties | Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. David S. DETRICH. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1388, 179 L.Ed.2d 557 (2011).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Detrich v. Ryan
...in light of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1388, 179 L.Ed.2d 557 (2011). See Ryan v. Detrich, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2449, 179 L.Ed.2d 1206 (2011) (Mem.). Having reconsidered the facts and issues of this case in light of Pinholster, see discussion infra at p. 983, we again......
-
Detrich v. Ryan
...in light of its decision in Cullen v. Pinholster, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1388, 179 L.Ed.2d 557 (2011). Ryan v. Detrich, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2449, 179 L.Ed.2d 1206 (2011) (mem.). On remand, the three-judge panel again reversed the district court and vacated the death sentence. Detrich......
-
Detrich v. Ryan
...The Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded in light of its decision in Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011). Ryan v. Detrich, 563 U.S. 984 (2011). On remand, the three-judge panel again reversed this Court, and vacated the death sentence. Detrich v. Ryan, 677 F.3d 958 (9th Ci......
-
Nathaniel United Statesher v. Hill, C 13-0766 RS (PR)
...a full case citation for Detrich. He wrote "S.CT. Detrich v. Ryan (2013)." (Docket No. 17 at 2.) The closest match is Ryan v. Detrich, 131 S. Ct. 2449 (Mem) (2011), in which the Supreme Court vacated a lower court ruling and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Cullen v. ......