Ryan v. Picard, No. 11–969.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 80 USLW 3707,80 USLW 3483,80 USLW 3705,183 L.Ed.2d 675,133 S.Ct. 24 |
| Docket Number | No. 11–969. |
| Parties | Theresa Rose RYAN, et al., petitioners, v. Irving H. PICARD, et al. |
| Decision Date | 25 June 2012 |
133 S.Ct. 24
183 L.Ed.2d 675
80 USLW 3483
80 USLW 3705
80 USLW 3707
Theresa Rose RYAN, et al., petitioners,
v.
Irving H. PICARD, et al.
No. 11–969.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 25, 2012.
Case below, In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Securities LLC, 654 F.3d 229.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
30 practice notes
-
Picard v. Avellino (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), Adv. Proc. No. 08–01789(SMB)
...“transfer” under the Net 557 B.R. 110Investment Method approved in In re BLMIS, 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012), and then credited the transferee account with the amount of the transfer up to the net equity in the transferor acco......
-
Irving H. Picard, Tr. for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC v. Estate (Succession) of Doris Igoin (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), Case No. 08–99000 (SMB)
...Corp. v. BLMIS (In re BLMIS), 424 B.R. 122, 125–32 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2010), aff'd,654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012). The Court assumes familiarity with those facts and limits its discussion to the facts relevant to this [525 B.R. 878]p......
-
Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08–01789 SMB
...; SIPC v. BLMIS (In re BLMIS ), 424 B.R. 122, 125–32 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2010), aff'd, 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012). The complaints allege the background in substantially the same language, and these facts will not be repeated exce......
-
Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (SMB)(Substantively Consolidated)
...424 B.R. 122, 125-32 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), aff'd , 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2011) (" Net Equity Decision "), cert. denied , 567 U.S. 934, 133 S.Ct. 24, 25, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012), and the Court limits the discussion to the facts necessary to explain this decision.On December 15, 2008, the Se......
Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
-
Picard v. Estate (Succession) of Doris Igoin (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), Case No. 08–99000 SMB
...Corp. v. BLMIS (In re BLMIS), 424 B.R. 122, 125–32 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2010), aff'd, 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012). The Court assumes familiarity with those facts and limits its discussion to the facts relevant to this 525 B.R. 878p......
-
Picard v. Avellino (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), Adv. Proc. No. 08–01789(SMB)
...“transfer” under the Net 557 B.R. 110Investment Method approved in In re BLMIS, 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012), and then credited the transferee account with the amount of the transfer up to the net equity in the transferor acco......
-
Irving H. Picard, Tr. for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC v. Estate (Succession) of Doris Igoin (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), Case No. 08–99000 (SMB)
...Corp. v. BLMIS (In re BLMIS), 424 B.R. 122, 125–32 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2010), aff'd,654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012). The Court assumes familiarity with those facts and limits its discussion to the facts relevant to this [525 B.R. 878]p......
-
Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (SMB)(Substantively Consolidated)
...424 B.R. 122, 125-32 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), aff'd , 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2011) (" Net Equity Decision "), cert. denied , 567 U.S. 934, 133 S.Ct. 24, 25, 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012), and the Court limits the discussion to the facts necessary to explain this decision.On December 15, 2008, the Se......
Request a trial to view additional results