Ryan v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OF US

Decision Date09 April 1968
Docket NumberNo. 21672.,21672.
PartiesAlden B. RYAN, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF the UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

James K. Perry (argued), of Ferr, Rinkwich & Perry, Venice, Cal., Alden B. Ryan, Glendale, Cal., for appellant.

Dzintra I. Janavs (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., William M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Civil Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by an unsuccessful applicant for disability insurance benefits provided by Section 223 of the Social Security Act 42 U.S.C. § 423.

The Secretary denied the application on the sole ground that Ryan, the applicant, did not meet the precondition of "inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment"; in essence, the Secretary's conclusion was that Ryan was mentally and physically able to work and that his plight was wholly due to a complete lack of environmental adaptability.

The record contains substantial evidence to that effect. Until 1960 Ryan had always resided in Illinois. His home, his work and his social and fraternal ties had all been in Chicago. However, in that year he and his wife left that city, coming to Los Angeles to live near their married daughter. Ryan soon learned that he could no longer engage in his lifelong vocation. While in high school he had started working part time in a pharmacy, and shortly afterwards secured a license as an apprentice. Having been so licensed prior to 1917, he had been permitted to take the Illinois pharmacists examination, under a waiver of the customary educational requirements, and had passed. But California did not extend reciprocity to pharmacists from other states and Ryan lacked the educational qualifications required of its applicants. Finally, in the fall of 1961, he took a job as a clerk in a pharmaceutical supply house; while working he fell from a ladder and suffered some injury to his left shoulder which, although painful, did not prevent him from continuing. However, in December he was fired. In the words of his immediate superior in charge "Ryan was an efficient man, but his disposition was so bad that it was becoming intolerable. He had to go."

He did not work at all throughout 1963 and in 1964 went back alone to Illinois, where he resumed his occupation as a pharmacist. However, after a short time and for reasons other than medical, he returned to his home in California. He has since been unsuccessful in holding any job.

While it is true that Ryan suffers from many afflictions common to advancing age, in the opinion of several examining doctors, including one specializing in psychiatry, his inability to engage in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Meneses v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 19 Febrero 1971
    ...is the appellant's attitude and not his aptitude which prevents him from engaging in gainful employment." See also Ryan v. Secretary of H.E.W., 393 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1968). Celebrezze v. O'Brient, 323 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1963), is not relevant here, because the hearing examiner had the bene......
  • Rayborn v. Weinberger
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • 14 Abril 1975
    ...293 (2d Cir. 1964). The Act is clearly intended to apply to not only physical ailments but mental conditions as well. Ryan v. Secretary of HEW, 393 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1968); Ross v. Gardner, 365 F.2d 554 (6th Cir. 1966). For a recent application of this rule see Griffis v. Weinberger, 509 F......
  • Gambill v. Finch, Civ. A. No. 6668.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • 19 Enero 1970
    ...395 F.2d 681 (C.A. 6, 1968); Rose v. Cohen, 406 F.2d 753 (C.A. 6, 1969); Labee v. Cohen, 408 F.2d 998 (C.A. 5, 1969); Ryan v. Secretary of HEW, 393 F.2d 340 (C.A. 9, 1968) (applying 1967 amendments to pending For the indicated reasons, the motion of the defendant for summary judgment is gra......
  • Powell v. SECRETARY, HEALTH, ED. & WELFARE
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • 2 Febrero 1976
    ...are not sufficient if they do not functionally impair the claimant from engaging in gainful employment. Ryan v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 393 F.2d 340 (9th Cir. 1968). It is significant that none of the medical authorities other than Dr. McClung could conclude plaintiff wa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT