S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Putman, 2022-UP-201

• Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM
• Parties: South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman, Brandon Lafredzo Robinson, and Marquies Lamar Cunningham, Defendants, Of whom Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman is the Appellant. In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
• Docket Number: Appellate Case 2021-001204,2022-UP-201
• Decision Date: 13 May 2022

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman, Brandon Lafredzo Robinson, and Marquies Lamar Cunningham, Defendants,

Of whom Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman is the Appellant. In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

No. 2022-UP-201

Appellate Case No. 2021-001204

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

May 13, 2022

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 12, 2022

Appeal From Laurens County Matthew P. Turner, Family Court Judge

Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Ashley Phillips Case, of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.

1

Marcus Wesley Meetze, of Law Office of Marcus W. Meetze, LLC, of Simpsonville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM

Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman appeals the family court's final order terminating parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Putnam's counsel.

AFFIRMED.^[1]

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

2

---------

Notes:

^[1] We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

---------