S.C. v. A.C.
| Decision Date | 03 May 1974 |
| Citation | 128 N.J.Super. 198,319 A.2d 733 |
| Parties | S.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.C., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Monroe Ackerman, Short Hills, for defendant-appellant (Rudd & Ackerman, Short Hills, attorneys; Charles E. Carlson, Jr., Newton, on the brief).
Everett M. Scherer, Newark, for plaintiff-respondent (Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, Newark, attorneys; Thomas C. C. Humick, Newark, on the brief).
Before Judges CARTON, LORA and SEIDMAN.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N.J.Super. 566, 304 A.2d 202 (Ch.Div.1973).
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
- State v. Finkle
-
Stern v. Stern
...property pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34--23. 123 N.J.Super. 566, 304 A.2d 202 (Ch.Div.1973). 1 The Appellate Division affirmed. 128 N.J.Super. 198, 319 A.2d 733 (1974). We granted certification at the instance of the defendant. 65 N.J. 568, 325 A.2d 702 There is no challenge to the grant of a d......
- S.C. v. A.C.