S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. Stemco LP

Docket NumberDA 16-0014
Decision Date13 December 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Biotronx, LLC v. Tech One Biomedical, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • June 8, 2020
    ...estoppel claims may be pursued in cases otherwise subject to the terms of the UCC. See, e.g., S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP, 385 Mont. 488, 385 P.3d 567, 574 (Mont. 2016) ("A majority of jurisdictions have adopted the rule that promissory estoppel may remove an oral contract from th......
  • Kapor v. RJC Inv., Inc.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • February 12, 2019
    ...statute of frauds. And recently we extended the application of promissory estoppel to U.C.C. cases. S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP , 2016 MT 324, ¶ 33, 385 Mont. 488, 385 P.3d 567. We conclude that the doctrine of equitable estoppel may apply to cases governed by the U.C.C. unless di......
  • Steffensmier v. Huebner
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • July 17, 2018
    ...improper exclusion of evidence unless the complaining party shows prejudice to a substantial right. S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP , 2016 MT 324, ¶ 51, 385 Mont. 488, 385 P.3d 567 ; see also M. R. Evid. 103(a). A party’s substantial right is not affected unless the error "is ‘of such......
  • In re Estate of Edwards
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • April 25, 2017
    ...in excluding evidence that it reasonably determines ... would likely lead to unnecessary confusion." S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP , 2016 MT 324, ¶ 51, 385 Mont. 488, 385 P.3d 567 (internal quotes and citation omitted) (hereafter S & P ). ¶50 "Even if a court abuses its discretion i......
  • Get Started for Free