SAARSTAHL AG v. US, Slip Op. 96-133. Consol. Court No. 93-04-00219.
| Decision Date | 13 August 1996 |
| Docket Number | Slip Op. 96-133. Consol. Court No. 93-04-00219. |
| Citation | 933 F. Supp. 1106 |
| Parties | SAARSTAHL AG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Inland Steel Bar Co., Defendant-Intervenor. |
| Court | U.S. Court of International Trade |
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit having remanded this matter to this Court, see Saarstahl AG v. United States, 78 F.3d 1539 (Fed.Cir.1996), rev'g and remanding Saarstahl, AG v. United States, 858 F.Supp. 187 (CIT 1994), and in light of this Court's opinions in British Steel PLC v. United States, 924 F.Supp. 139 (CIT 1996), appeals docketed, Nos. 96-1401 to -06 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 1996), and British Steel PLC v. United States, 936 F.Supp. 1053 (CIT 1996), it is hereby
ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Department of Commerce; and it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall follow this Court's opinion in British Steel PLC v. United States, 936 F.Supp. 1053 (CIT 1996) in performing its remand determination. Given that the relevant facts appear to be the same as those discussed in that opinion, Commerce may submit a remand determination virtually identical to the remand determination discussed in that opinion; and it is further
ORDERED that Commerce shall file its remand determination with this Court no later than August 19, 1996; and it is further
ORDERED that Commerce, Saarstahl AG, Inland Steel Bar Company, and amicus curiae may each file one submission commenting on the remand determination. Comments shall not exceed five pages. All comments must be filed no later than August 23, 1996.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cpc Intern., Inc. v. U.S., Slip Op. 97-97.
... ... Slip Op. 97-97 ... Court No. 95-02-00144 ... United States Court of International ... ...
-
Saarstahl Ag v. U.S., Slip Op. 97-67.
...creditworthiness in 1989. As a result, this Court subsequently remanded the action to Commerce in Saarstahl AG v. United States, 933 F.Supp. 1106 (CIT 1996) ("Saarstahl I"). Following the CAFC's decision in Saarstahl AG v. United States, 78 F.3d 1539 (Fed.Cir.1996), this Court ruled on the ......
-
Saarstahl AG v. U.S.
...V "), Saarstahl AG v. United States, 939 F.Supp. 898 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996) ("Saarstahl IV "), and Saarstahl AG v. United States, 933 F.Supp. 1106 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996) ("Saarstahl III "). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and Between 1978 and 1985, Saarstahl Volklingen GmbH ("SVK") rece......
-
SAARSTAHL AG v. US, Slip Op. 96-154. Consol. Court No. 93-04-00219.
...This Court subsequently remanded the action to the Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or "Department") in Saarstahl AG v. United States, 933 F.Supp. 1106 (CIT1996). APPLICATION OF U.S. CIT R. U.S. CIT R. 54(b) provides in part: When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, ......