Sadler v. Sadler

CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtWATTS, J.
CitationSadler v. Sadler, 115 S.C. 217, 105 S.E. 285 (S.C. 1920)
Decision Date20 December 1920
Docket Number10554.
PartiesSADLER v. SADLER.

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of York County; W. H Townsend, Judge.

Action by Beatrice Sadler against William Sadler. From an order allowing temporary alimony and suit money, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Thos F. McDow, and J. S. Brice, both of York, for appellant.

Gaston & Hamilton, of Chester, and John R. Hart, of York, for respondent.

WATTS J.

This is an appeal from an order allowing temporary alimony and suit money made by his honor, Judge Townsend, who heard the matter on affidavits and passed an order allowing the respondent $20 per month, temporary alimony, and allowing her counsel $300 suit money. Appellant appeals, and by six exceptions alleges error.

The exceptions allege abuse of discretion on the part of his honor; that the amounts allowed were excessive; that under the showing made he should have refused to allow anything that the weight of the evidence showed that the respondent had ample means to support herself; and that the appellant had in spirit and in fact performed faithfully all of the duties imposed upon him by his marital obligations.

This court has repeatedly decided that the allowance of temporary alimony and counsel fee is a matter within the discretion of the circuit judge, and we see no abuse of discretion on...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • State v. Pridmore
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1931
  • Leysath v. Leysath
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1924
    ...Wise, 119 S.C. 10, 111 S.E. 792; Cleveland v. Cleveland (S. C.) 122 S.E. 500; Molloy v. Molloy, 107 S.C. 99, 91 S.E. 971; Sadler v. Sadler, 115 S.C. 217, 105 S.E. 285; O'Neal v. O'Neal (S. C.) 123 S.E. Judgment affirmed. FRASER, COTHRAN, and MARION, JJ., concur. GARY, C.J., did not particip......