Safeguard Mutual Ins Co v. Housing Authority of City of Camden
| Decision Date | 01 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 1208,1208 |
| Citation | 20 L.Ed.2d 253,88 S.Ct. 1417,390 U.S. 716 |
| Parties | SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. CO. v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF CAMDEN et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Malcolm W. Berkowitz and Sidney W. Bookbinder, for appellant.
Bryan B. McKernan, for appellee Housing Authority of City of Camden.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Ala, 42
... ... , and definite standards to guide the licensing authority, is unconstitutional. 2 'It is settled by a long line of ... ...
-
In re Buckey, 18599.
... ... It is no less important to safeguard against undue interruption the inquiry instituted ... ...
-
Stern v. Robinson, 17768.
...D. C., on the brief), for appellees. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK, and McCREE, Circuit Judges. Certiorari Denied April 22, 1968. See 88 S.Ct. 1417. JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against the defendant agent of the Internal Revenue Service and the United Stat......
- Horlock v. Oglesby, 1217
Request a trial to view additional results