Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Lighting & Heating Co.

Citation223 F. 1023
Decision Date22 June 1915
Docket Number282.
PartiesSAFETY CAR HEATING & LIGHTING CO. v. UNITED STATES LIGHTING & HEATING CO. et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the District Court, Western District of New York, finding infringement by defendants of United States patent No. 747,686, granted December 22, 1903, to J. L. Crevelling, assignor to complainant. The patent is for a 'system of electrical regulation.' It discloses a storage battery charging system adapted for use in connection with what are called axle car-lighting systems, in which the generator is driven from the car axle. The opinion of the District Judge will be found in (D.C.) 222 F. 310.

W. Clyde Jones, of Chicago, Ill., and A. B. Siebold and Charles Oakes, of New York City, for appellants. Duell, Warfield & Duell, of New York City (C. H. Duell, F. P. Warfield, H. S. Duell, and T. J. Johnston, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before LACOMBE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We fully concur with Judge Hazel in his discussion of the questions presented and in his conclusion. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • United States v. Safety Car Heating Lighting Co Rogers v. Same
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1936
    ...Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. U.S. Light & Heating Co., 222 F. 310) for an injunction, which was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals (223 F. 1023) in July of the same year. An accounting followed before a master and continued for eight years. On that accounting the complainant waived a......
  • Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • June 22, 1915
    ...as shown in the Creveling patent (Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co., 222 F. 310, affirmed 223 F. 1023, 138 C.C.A. 651), it was demonstrated that, secure better and more economic results and to effectively avoid injury from overcharging the battery, means......
  • Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • September 11, 1917
    ...and held infringed, in an action brought by the plaintiff herein against the United States Light & Heating Company (222 F. 310, affirmed 223 F. 1023, . . . C.C.A. . . .), and held not infringed in case against its successor, the United States Light & Heat Corporation; it being shown in the ......
  • Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. U.S. Light & Heat Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • October 19, 1916
    ...237 F. 646 SAFETY CAR HEATING & LIGHTING CO. v. UNITED STATES LIGH & HEAT CORP. No. 163-B.United States District Court, W.D. New York.October 19, 1916 ... Duell, ... Warfield & Duell, of New ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT