Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Willmon

• Decision Date: 05 May 1986
• Docket Number: No. 86-3,86-3
• Citation: Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Willmon, 289 Ark. 14, 708 S.W.2d 623 (Ark. 1986)
• Parties: SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Owen WILLMON, Appellee.
• Court: Arkansas Supreme Court

Page 623

708 S.W.2d 623

289 Ark. 14

SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Owen WILLMON, Appellee.

No. 86-3.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 5, 1986.

Laser, Sharp & Mayes, Little Rock, for appellant.

Dodds, Kidd, Ryan & Moore, Little Rock, for appellee.

DUDLEY, Justice.

The appellee, the plaintiff below, was a customer in the Safeway Store in Malvern and, while pushing a shopping cart down an aisle, slipped on a liquid substance and fell. At trial, the court overruled appellant's motions for a directed verdict, both at the close of the case-in-chief and at the close of all evidence. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in submitting the issue of negligence to the jury. The argument is well taken. We reverse and dismiss.

The law governing the liability of a store owner for injuries to a business invitee who slips and falls on a foreign substance on the premises is well settled. To establish liability of the store owner to the invitee, the invitee must prove that the presence of the foreign substance on the floor was the result of negligence on the part of the store owner, or that the substance had been on the floor for such a length of time that the storekeeper knew, or reasonably should have known, of its presence and failed to use ordinary care to remove it. The mere fact that a patron slips and falls in a store does not raise an inference of negligence. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable. Ledford v. Gas Mart Co., Inc., 259 Ark. 1, 531 S.W.2d 11 (1975).

Appellee slipped on a substance which was specifically identified as clear water by two of appellant's employees who made an inspection of the liquid. The only evidence indicating the foreign substance might be something other than plain water was when the appellee testified that some unknown store employee told him it looked like soapy water.

None of the witnesses knew the origin of the water. Appellee called the store manager as his witness, and the manager speculated that...