Saleemi v. Doctor's Assocs., Inc.
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Citation | Saleemi v. Doctor's Assocs., Inc., 278 P.3d 1111, 174 Wash.2d 1001 (Wash. 2012) |
| Decision Date | 05 June 2012 |
| Docket Number | NO. 87062-4 |
| Parties | Waqas Saleemi, a single man, Farooq Sharyar, a single man v. Doctor's Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation |
174 Wash.2d 1001
278 P.3d 1111
Waqas Saleemi, a single man, Farooq Sharyar, a single man
v.
Doctor's Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation
NO. 87062-4
Supreme Court of Washington
June 05, 2012
Appeal From: 40351–0–II, 166 Wash.App. 81, 269 P.3d 350
Petition For Review: Granted.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Saleemi v. Doctor's Assocs., Inc.
...relief. Saleemi v. Doctor's Assocs., Inc., 166 Wash.App. 81, 98, 269 P.3d 350 (2012). We accepted review. Saleemi v. Doctor's Assocs., Inc., 174 Wash.2d 1001, 278 P.3d 1111 (2012).ANALYSIS ¶ 11 We typically review trial court decisions to compel or deny arbitration de novo. Zuver v. Airtouc......
- State v. Haq
-
Klem v. Wash. Mut. Bank
...Wash.2d 1005278 P.3d 1111Dianne Klemv.Washington Mutual Bank, Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, Quality Loan Service CorporationNO. 87105-1Supreme Court of WashingtonJune 06, Appeal From: 66252–0–I Petition For Review: Granted....
- In re Dependency of A.P.