Saleh v. Titan Corp.
| Decision Date | 27 June 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–1313.,09–1313. |
| Citation | 131 S.Ct. 3055 (Mem),564 U.S. 1037,180 L.Ed.2d 886 |
| Parties | Haidar Muhsin SALEH, et al., petitioners, v. TITAN CORPORATION, et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc.
...1 (D.C.Cir.2009) (finding that claims by detainees alleging mistreatment by contractors were preempted), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 3055, 180 L.Ed.2d 886 (2011). Saleh remains the leading case in this area because two other Courts of Appeals have followed our Circuit and dismisse......
-
Shimari v. CACI Int'l, Inc.
...from tort liability in a war zone, as recognized under Saleh v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C.Cir.2009), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 3055, 180 L.Ed.2d 886 (2011); and (3) law-of-war immunity, as recognized by the Supreme Court in Dow v. Johnson, 100 U.S. 158, 25 L.Ed. 632 (1880). O......
-
Metzgar v. KBR, Inc. (In re KBR, Inc.)
...cannot lawfully engage in ‘combat functions' or ‘combat operations.’ ” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae at 15, Saleh v. Titan Corp., ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 3055, 180 L.Ed.2d 886 (2011) (No. 09–1313). Therefore, the United States argued that it was inappropriate for the Saleh test ......
-
Al–quraishi v. L–3 Serv.
...States as Amicus Curiae Opposing Certiorari at 7, Saleh v. Titan Corp., No. 09–1313 (U.S. May 2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 3055, 180 L.Ed.2d 886 (2011). Notably, despite significant discovery in Saleh as to the contractor-military relationship, the Solicitor General did not......
Request a trial to view additional results