Salem v. Mott

Decision Date07 August 2007
Docket Number2007-01276.
Citation43 A.D.3d 397,839 N.Y.S.2d 919,2007 NY Slip Op 06353
PartiesLISA SALEM, Respondent, v. CARL MOTT, Defendant. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of LISA SALEM, Respondent, v. CMS MONITORING, INC., Appellant. (Matter No. 2.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

"It is the appellant's obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal" (Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 689, 689 [2007]). Where, as here, meaningful appellate review of the Supreme Court's determination is made virtually impossible because of the incomplete nature of the record submitted, dismissal of the appeal is the appropriate disposition (id.; see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Vargas, 288 AD2d 309, 310 [2001]; Singh v Getty Petroleum Corp., 275 AD2d 740 [2000]).

Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Vivian T. v. Linda B. (In re Jeanette T.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 2, 2013
    ...A.D.3d 900, 901, 958 N.Y.S.2d 479, quoting Garnerville Holding Co. v. IMC Mgt., 299 A.D.2d 450, 450, 749 N.Y.S.2d 892;see Salem v. Mott, 43 A.D.3d 397, 839 N.Y.S.2d 919). Here, the record on appeal is inadequate, as the appellant failed to include the affidavit of the petitioner/defendant, ......
  • Town of Wawayanda v. O'Neil
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 18, 2014
    ...Court to undertake “meaningful appellate review” of the Supreme Court's determination, the appeal must be dismissed ( Salem v. Mott, 43 A.D.3d 397, 397, 839 N.Y.S.2d 919;see Matter of Jeanette T. [Vivian T.-Linda B.], 110 A.D.3d 728, 971 N.Y.S.2d 878;Rubio–Modica v. Modica, 100 A.D.3d 979, ......
  • Green Tree Credit, LLC v. Jelks
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 17, 2014
    ...obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal ( see Keita v. United Parcel Serv., 65 A.D.3d 571, 884 N.Y.S.2d 139; Salem v. Mott, 43 A.D.3d 397, 839 N.Y.S.2d 919). Here, the record is inadequate because it does not include all of the relevant papers and documents that were before the Sup......
  • Nyctl 1998-1 Trust v. Cooper Third Associates, 2006-05350.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 7, 2007
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT