Sallee v. Stewart

Docket Number110892
Decision Date15 February 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
  • State v. McKinley
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • March 13, 2015
    ...and “former client” cannot mean the same thing. We presume statutes or rules do not contain superfluous words. See Sallee v. Stewart, 827 N.W.2d 128, 153 (Iowa 2013) ; State v. Soboroff, 798 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2011). Thus, “another client” means another current client. Rouse, Hickman, and Ma......
  • Shoemaker v. Funkhouser
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 25, 2021
    ...a recreational use covered by the Arizona statute. 195 Ariz. 214, 218, 986 P.2d 247, 252 (Ct. App. 1999) ; see also Sallee v. Stewart , 827 N.W.2d 128, 153 (Iowa 2013) ; Glorioso v. City of Kenner , 285 So. 3d 601, 604-05 (La. Ct. App. 5 Cir. 2019) ; Quesenberry v. Milwaukee Cty. , 106 Wis.......
  • Goodpaster v. Schwan's Home Serv., Inc.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 27, 2014
    ...649 (Iowa 2000). “The burden is on the moving party to demonstrate that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Sallee v. Stewart, 827 N.W.2d 128, 133 (Iowa 2013). As we determine whether the moving party has met this burden, we view the record in the light most favorable to the non......
  • State v. Hall
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • January 21, 2022
    ...was charged. We are not at liberty to read the statute to prohibit conduct not plainly encompassed by its terms. See Sallee v. Stewart , 827 N.W.2d 128, 150 (Iowa 2013) ("We do not engage in innovations or improvements of the statute. Rather, we interpret it as we find it."). We therefore v......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • When a Statute Comes With a User Manual: Reconciling Textualism and Uniform Acts
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 71-6, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...2B Norman J. Singer & J.D. Shambie Singer, Statutes & Statutory Construction § 52:5) (first alteration in original); Sallee v. Stewart, 827 N.W.2d 128, 142 (Iowa 2013) (same); see also Heirs of Ellis v. Estate of Ellis, 71 S.W.3d 705, 713-14 (Tenn. 2002) ("When the legislature enacts provis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT