Sampson v. State, 31166
| Decision Date | 09 July 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 31166,31166 |
| Parties | Willie SAMPSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Bruce E. Bloom, Bruce R. Snyder, Fort Wayne, for appellant.
John J. Dillon, Atty.Gen. of Indiana, Douglas M. McFadden, Asst.Atty.Gen., Duejean C. Garrett, Deputy Atty.Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.
MEMORANDUM ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The appellant, through his attorney, requests a rehearing citing again Miranda v. State of Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, which he had previously cited in his brief.
This matter was decided purely on the special facts in the case on appeal. This court does not question the holding in the Miranda case, supra. Under the facts brought out in this record, as was indicated in the Per Curiam opinion, 14 Ind.Dec. 413, 237 N.E.2d 254, heretofore handed down, the defendant came within the purview of Miranda, supra and under the facts of the particular circumstances, was given sufficient warning.
The rehearing is, therefore, denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. R.M.
...General, 285 Ala. 756, 235 So.2d 906 (Ala.1970). See also Sampson v. State, 250 Ind. 625, 237 N.E.2d 254, reh'g denied, 250 Ind. 625, 238 N.E.2d 458 (1968); Lloyd v. State, 223 Tenn. 1, 440 S.W.2d 797 (Tenn.1969); Madkins v. State, 50 Wis.2d 347, 184 N.W.2d 144 The majority states that ther......
-
Mulry v. State
...their maker. Goodloe v. State, (1969) 253 Ind. 270, 252 N.E.2d 788; Sampson v. State, (1968) 250 Ind. 625, 237 N.E.2d 254, reh. denied 238 N.E.2d 458; Dawson v. State, (1975) 163 Ind.App. 493, 324 N.E.2d The Indiana legislature has enacted IC 35-5-5-2 (Burns Code Ed.1979 Repl.) to guide the......
-
Brown v. State
...that may be drawn therefrom. Buckner v. State (1969), Ind., 248 N.E.2d 348; Sampson v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 625, 237 N.E.2d 254, 238 N.E.2d 458. The following testimony of Ronald Schoolcraft is 'Q. And what, if anything, did you tell the defendant at that time? A. I mentioned I had some c......
-
Newman v. State, 669S133
...that may be drawn therefrom. Buckner v. State (1969), Ind., 248 N.E.2d 348; Sampson v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 625, 237 N.E.2d 254, 238 N.E.2d 458. We feel the evidence presented to the trial court is clearly sufficient to sustain appellant's With regard to Specification #13 of appellant's m......